[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

So I Broke into your house

Bruce Ohr May Have Broken More Than The Law By Pushing His Wife’s Opposition Research To The FBI

Trump admin files formal complaint against Facebook for 'discriminatory' policy

Mozilla / Firefox goes all in for EVIL… Pushes corporate news collusion to silence independent media

LOOK WHAT STATUE JUST WENT UP IN ARKANSAS

Trump Is a 'Russian Asset' Owned by the Mafia

Federal courts now accepting cryptocurrency for bail

Stop Calling Us "Mormons"

Over-looked BS: WOW: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Releases New Information on President Obama's Birth Certificate (FNN)

Fear and Loathing in the Land of Political Retards

Police Raided Their Home and Business, Seized Their Money, and Nearly Ruined Their Lives Over Some Weed

Deep State Conspiracy Revealed - Bruce Ohr's CIA Russia Expert Wife Worked with Fusion GPS

Bruce & Nellie Ohr. 302s, Fusion GPS-Simpson, Christopher Steele

Satanic Temple statue unveiled at the Arkansas State Capitol

40 ESPN president Jimmy Pitaro: Network won't show national anthem on 'Monday Night Football'

Afghanistan Has Become Trump’s ‘Failed Narco State’

476 Made Sick From Eating McDonald's Salads - Drinking Lemomade From Kids' Stands, Zero

Steve Martin Stays Away from Trump Jokes for a Reason: ‘We’re Not Here To Preach’

Seymour Hersh and the Disappearing Iconoclast He won a Pulitzer for My Lai and cracked Abu Ghraib wide open. But this reporter is still a lonely breed.

Trump's military parade has been delayed to at least 2019

2015 United Nations Paper Proposed Government Licensing To “Supervise Content” Online

Los Angeles Is First In US To Install Intrusive Subway Security - All Riders Will 'Volunteer'

Syria - Pentagon Plants High ISIS Numbers To Justify Occupation

A California cop feared for his life when a child's dog came to the door, so he opened fire and his bullet hit an 11-year-old boy.

Friday News

BREAKING: Bruce Ohr Texts, Emails Reveal Steele’s Deep Ties to Obama DOJ, FBI

Bleeding-Heart Liberals Bike Through Tajikistan to Prove “Evil Is a Make-Believe Concept” — Are Stabbed Dead By ISIS

Aretha Franklin, the legendary Queen of Soul, is dead at 76

Psychedelics Are Showing Real Promise for Treating Mental Disorders

The Internet Is Crowdfunding the Release of 4,358 Secret CIA Mind Control Documents

Report Shows FDA Manipulating and Ignoring Science on Kratom

Facebook Bans Infowars As Rapper Who Posted Child Porn to Instagram Keeps His Account

Deaf 76-year-old Woman Knocked Unconscious and Arrested Over Alleged Jaywalking

Nancy Pelosi: Maxine Waters ‘Strikes Fear in the Heart’ of Trump

The 73rd Anniversary of the Bombing of Nagasaki (Unwelcome Truths for Church and State)

These TSA Reject Dogs Are Too Good for the Government Anyway

"Rock & Roll Judges"

No, Pope Francis Is Not Changing the Lord's Prayer

Colorado Is Going After Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop Again

Arizona father beats, kills man who followed his daughter into bathroom stall, police say

Cubans cheer as internet goes nationwide for a day

Two (or Three) Kinds of Honesty - Trump is hyper-intensely himself.

Investigative Journalist Found Dead in D.C. Hotel Room Weeks After Reporting Bill Clinton to FBI & DHS for Allegedly Raping Boy

Cops Raid Wrong Home, Hold 9-year-old and 6-year-old Boys at Gunpoint

The Coordinated 'War of Words' Against Trump [Democrat-Owned Media Cartel Admit Collusion Against Trump]

Chelsea Clinton Claims Aborting 60 Million Babies Since Roe “Added $3.5 Trillion to Our Economy”

87-year-old Great-Grandmother Tasered in Her Breast by Police While Cutting Dandelions with a Knife

Technocrats Rule: Democracy Is OK as Long as the People Rubberstamp Our Leadership

Somerville’s mayor says he won’t drink Sam Adams anymore after Jim Koch thanked Trump for a tax break

Judge Releases Suspects Accused of Abusing and Training Children to Carry Out School Shootings


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How To
See other How To Articles

Title: Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People’s Organs Without Explicit Consent
Source: CNS
URL Source: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/53534
Published: Sep 5, 2009
Author: Matt Cover
Post Date: 2009-09-05 09:46:24 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 6815
Comments: 12

Cass Sunstein, President Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else when they die unless that person has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken.

Under such a policy, hospitals would harvest organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done.

Outlined in the 2008 book “Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness,” Sunstein and co-author Richard H. Thaler argued that the main reason that more people do not donate their organs is because they are required to choose donation.

Sunstein and Thaler pointed out that doctors often must ask the deceased’s family members whether or not their dead relative would have wanted to donate his organs. These family members usually err on the side of caution and refuse to donate their loved one’s organs.

“The major obstacle to increasing [organ] donations is the need to get the consent of surviving family members,” said Sunstein and Thaler.

This problem could be remedied if governments changed the laws for organ donation, they said. Currently, unless a patient has explicitly chosen to be an organ donor, either on his driver’s license or with a donor card, the doctors assume that the person did not want to donate and therefore do not harvest his organs. Thaler and Sunstein called this “explicit consent.”

They argued that this could be remedied if government turned the law around and assumed that, unless people explicitly choose not to, then they want to donate their organs – a doctrine they call “presumed consent.”

“Presumed consent preserves freedom of choice, but it is different from explicit consent because it shifts the default rule. Under this policy, all citizens would be presumed to be consenting donors, but they would have the opportunity to register their unwillingness to donate,” they explained.

The difference between explicit and presumed consent is that under presumed consent, many more people “choose” to be organ donors. Sunstein and Thaler noted that in a 2003 study only 42 percent of people actively chose to be organ donors, while only 18 percent actively opted out when their consent was presumed.

In cases where the deceased’s wishes are unclear, Sunstein and Thaler argued that a “presumed consent” system would make it easier for doctors to convince families to donate their loved one’s organs.

Citing a 2006 study, Thaler and Sunstein wrote: “The next of kin can be approached quite differently when the decedent’s silence is presumed to indicate a decision to donate rather than when it is presumed to indicate a decision not to donate. This shift may make it easier for the family to accept organ donation.”

The problem of the deceased’s family is only one issue, Sunstein and Thaler said, admitting that turning the idea of choice on its head will invariably run into major political problems, but these are problems they say the government can solve through a system of “mandated choice.”

“Another [problem] is that it is a hard sell politically,” wrote Sunstein and Thaler. “More than a few people object to the idea of ‘presuming’ anything when it comes to such a sensitive matter. For these reasons we think that the best choice architecture for organ donations is mandated choice.”

Mandated choice is a process where government forces you to make a decision – in this case, whether to opt out of being an organ donor to get something you need, such as a driver’s license.

“With mandated choice, renewal of your driver’s license would be accompanied by a requirement that you check a box stating your organ donation preferences,” the authors stated. “Your application would not be accepted unless you had checked one of the boxes.”

To ensure that people’s decisions align with the government policy of more organ donors, Sunstein and Thaler counseled that governments should follow the state of Illinois’ example and try to influence people by making organ donation seem popular.

“First, the state stresses the importance of the overall problem (97,000 people [in Illinois] on the waiting list and then brings the problem home, literally (4,700 in Illinois),” they wrote.

“Second, social norms are directly brought into play in a way that build on the power of social influences [peer pressure]: ‘87 percent of adults in Illinois feel that registering as an organ donor is the right thing to do’ and ’60 percent of adults in Illinois are registered,’” they added.

Sunstein and Thaler reminded policymakers that people will generally do what they think others are doing and what they believe others think is right. These presumptions, which almost everyone has, act as powerful factors as policymakers seek to design choices.

“Recall that people like to do what most people think is right to do; recall too that people like to do what most people actually do,” they wrote. “The state is enlisting existing norms in the direction of lifestyle choices.”

Thaler and Sunstein believed that this and other policies are necessary because people don’t really make the best decisions.

“The false assumption is that almost all people, almost all of the time, make choices that are in their best interest or at the very least are better than the choices that would be made [for them] by someone else,” they said.

This means that government “incentives and nudges” should replace “requirements and bans,” they argued.

Neither Sunstein nor Thaler currently are commenting on their book, a spokesman for the publisher, Penguin Group, told CNSNews.com.

In a question-and-answer section on the Amazon.com Web site, Thaler and Sunstein answered a few questions about their book.

When asked what the title “Nudge” means and why people need to be nudged, the authors stated: “By a nudge we mean anything that influences our choices. A school cafeteria might try to nudge kids toward good diets by putting the healthiest foods at front.

“We think that it's time for institutions, including government, to become much more user-friendly by enlisting the science of choice to make life easier for people and by gently nudging them in directions that will make their lives better,” they wrote.

“…The human brain is amazing, but it evolved for specific purposes, such as avoiding predators and finding food,” said Thaler and Sunstein. “Those purposes do not include choosing good credit card plans, reducing harmful pollution, avoiding fatty foods, and planning for a decade or so from now. Fortunately, a few nudges can help a lot. …”


Poster Comment:

Sicko.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Under such a policy, hospitals would harvest organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done.

China has this policy. I'd expect nothing less from a pisswad like this obamunist Sunshade guy.

e_type_jag  posted on  2009-12-05   23:33:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: e_type_jag (#1)

Sounds like we have some agreement.

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-06   9:02:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Sicko is right, this WH pimp has surrounded himself with the lowest, sickest bunch of garbage thugs I have ever seen. If ever we need some trash thrown out, now is the time before it's too late.

Murron  posted on  2009-12-06   9:11:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#0)

The headline of this article and the premise of the article itself are lies and gross misrepresentations of the referenced author's point. The article clearly states that Thaler and Sunstein wrote "we think that the best choice architecture for organ donations is mandated choice." However, the headline reads "Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People’s Organs Without Explicit Consent".

The former is clearly an opinion (which people are presumably still allowed to have, even if they work in the Obama Administration) and not the current law, while the latter is disingenuous political spin which appears to stem from the headline writer's apparently not liking black people very much.

With the crying need that exists for transplantable organs, the life this idea could save could be your own, an idea that I assume even rock-ribbed social conservatives could get behind.

In the interest of sheer honesty, please correct the headline to read "Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Requiring That People Decide Whether Their Organs Should Be Removed Upon Their Death."

What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina? Only some of the things that come out of her vagina are retarded.

Racism_Boot  posted on  2009-12-06   11:18:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Racism_Boot (#4)

In the interest of sheer honesty, please correct the headline to read "Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Requiring That People Decide Whether Their Organs Should Be Removed Upon Their Death."

The headline is accurate.

A question for you though.

From where in the article do you deduce that the author hates black people?

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-06   11:32:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)

The headline is accurate.

Nope, not even close. The headline is pure propaganda and spin, and contains no truth whatsoever.

And where do YOU deduce that I said that the author "hated black people"? What I actually said is that there is evidence that he apparently doesn't like them very much, a hypothesis borne out by the fact that he repeatedly attacks and assigns ulterior motives to Barack Obama personally in the column for an arguably controversial view held by one of his advisors. Just because Larry Craig had an "R" next to his name doesn't mean that I take the wide stance of accusing George W. Bush of trolling for gay sex in airport restrooms.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina? Only some of the things that come out of her vagina are retarded.

Racism_Boot  posted on  2009-12-06   11:42:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#5)

By the by, you're running a great site here. I would have already been banned by stick-up-the-ass Sally over at Flibbertygibbetpost for daring to challenge her ADL-mandated "conventional wisdom" or RimJob at FreakRepublic for not smooching Bush's ass even after he called Bush a "cokehead". Kudos, sir or madam.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina? Only some of the things that come out of her vagina are retarded.

Racism_Boot  posted on  2009-12-06   11:53:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Racism_Boot (#6)

Obama appointed this freak. Larry wasn't appointed by Bush. He was elected by the people of his state.

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-06   12:05:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Racism_Boot (#7) (Edited)

I disagree with your view on this thread. But you are in no danger of being banned or being told what to post or think.

Have a good time here. Welcome if I haven't already welcomed you.

Oh...and it is Sir.

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-06   12:07:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: A K A Stone (#8)

Obama appointed this freak. Larry wasn't appointed by Bush. He was elected by the people of his state.

I'll try to remember that Presidents are always bound by and agree with the opinions of their advisors and not influential people within their own party the next time that somebody trashes Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi here.

As for holding Presidents accountable for everything their advisors say, who exactly held George W. Bush accountable for the opinion of his advisor John Yoo who once publicly argued that there is no law that could prevent the President from ordering the torture of a child of a suspect in custody – including the crushing of said child’s testicles?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11488.htm

Selective outrage is just so darned selective.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina? Only some of the things that come out of her vagina are retarded.

Racism_Boot  posted on  2009-12-06   12:58:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Racism_Boot (#10)

who exactly held George W. Bush accountable for the opinion of his advisor John Yoo who once publicly argued that there is no law that could prevent the President from ordering the torture of a child of a suspect in custody – including the crushing of said child’s testicles?

I'm against torture.

Obama is for torturing babies.

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-06   17:32:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#11)

I'm against torture.

Torture has its place in the grand scheme of things. Why, with the right companion, some rope, a bottle of vegetable oil, a live chicken, and a pair of fur-lined handcuffs, it can actually be quite entertaining.

Obama is much too conventional and white-bread to go in for torture though (unless you count the talking heads at Faux News who scream like so many stuck pigs every time he opens his mouth).

What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina? Only some of the things that come out of her vagina are retarded.

Racism_Boot  posted on  2009-12-06   18:39:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com