[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*

Ladies Professional Golf Association using facial recognition technology to surveil fans and spectators

The world’s most nutritious foods

Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly,' lawyer says — Schnatter just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board

New Kentucky Law Puts Limits on Drone Spying, Will Help Thwart Federal Surveillance Program

What To Learn From The Social Justice Warrior Who Was Eaten By His Own Mob

Is the Media the “Enemy of the People”?

Well, I think I am going to have to schedule a surgery

War...

Las Vegas Police Body Cam: Cop Fires Through Windshield

3 Problems With Libertarianism - After Economics

Brazile, Rice, Obama Gave Russian Hackers Free Rein

The irrational hysteria over Trump and Putin

John Brennan Misses Communist Russia

The Latest: Trump says he misspoke on Russia meddling

Cop Charged After Video Shows Him Execute Unarmed Mother by Shooting Her in the Head

Cop Encounters Tortoise Going Too Slow on Highway, Overcomes His Fear and Doesn't Shoot.

Keeping Cops’ Hands Out of Your Pockets

Trump-Putin Summit Success: Neocons Furious!

Mandalay Bay's owner MGM has sued the Las Vegas mass shooting victims, claiming it's not liable for the massacre

Eric July On Why The Only Rights Are ‘Negative Rights’

Russian woman charged with being Putin’s SPY by joining NRA during Trump election campaign

Tucker Carlson: Mexico has interfered in US elections 'more successfully' than Russia

Months Before His Death, Anthony Bourdain Blasted ‘Rapey’ Bill Clinton, Exposed Hillary’s Complicity

The Shroud Of Turin Is Not Jesus' Burial Cloths

Trump calls off Cold War II

Police Come to Iraqi Veteran’s Home, Attempt to Confiscate His Guns, He Tells Them No

Hillary Clinton Is Exhausted, Everybody

‘Palestinian’ Man Skates Murder Charge for Stabbing Israeli Woman in Back, Sentenced on Assault

Trump's Putin Summit Is Another Reminder He Prefers Dictators to Democratic Leaders

Libertarians’ reality problem: How an estrangement from history yields abject failure

Trump Is Right to Meet Putin

Full transcript of Chris Wallace's interview in Helsinki with Russian president Vladimir Putin, as supplied by Fox News.

Chris Wallace interviews Russian President Vladimir Putin

Once Again, President Trump Is Magnificently Right—This Time About Russia

McCain rips Trump: 'One of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory'

Trump condemned as treasonous after press conference with Putin

How Everything is Racist, And You’re a Terrible Person

The big influence of 'Big Pink'

Documents Reveal Two US Soldiers Overheard Plot To Kill JFK—and Were Committed After Reporting It

Fox's Perino: Strzok marriage questions by GOP lawmaker 'felt like a public lynching (Relly? I don't think so, Dana!'

Trump: Strzok's testimony 'a disgrace to our country'

Trump Is Right: Mueller’s Latest Indictment Suggests He’s Conducting A Witch Hunt

Constitutional Conservatives Fail the Drug Test

Chipped Tires

A collision of views as Bath Township calls artist's work 'junk,' heads to court

How Elected Libertarians Are Making the World More Free

The fundamental contradiction of libertarianism

Dinosaur and man walking together

You're killin' me, Smalls. 'The Sandlot' celebrates 25th anniversary


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health/Medical
See other Health/Medical Articles

Title: Jim Jordan Crushes Reince Priebus False Narrative on Obamacare Repeal
Source: Politistick
URL Source: http://politistick.com/jim-jordan-c ... se-narrative-obamacare-repeal/
Published: Mar 27, 2017
Author: Matthew K. Burke
Post Date: 2017-03-27 17:47:53 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 2778
Comments: 68

One of the false narratives peddled by establishment RINO squishes like Reince Priebus in order to get principled conservatives to act like liberal Democrats is to spew the phony premise, “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

Priebus said as much to FOX News’ Chris Wallace Sunday when he said, “We can’t be chasing the perfect all the time.”

It was intended to be a slam against the House Freedom Caucus, which insisted that Republicans keep their promise of fully repealing Obamacare, something the failed American Health Care Act (AHCA) did not do and kept in place the entire Obamacare apparatus and many of the regulations that caused health insurance premiums and deductibles to unnecessarily skyrocket.

But as House Freedom Caucus founding member Jim Jordan told MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Monday, House GOP leadership didn’t come anywhere close to perfection when they crafted Paul Ryan’s health care bill behind closed doors, the bill dubbed Obamacare 2.0, Obamacare Lite, RINOCARE, or Swampcare. Far from seeking perfection, the bill “wasn’t even good.”

“The lesson here is, don’t try to pass a bill that only 17 percent of the country approves of,” Jordan declared. “That’s a problem.”
“Mr. Priebus was talking about don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Well, this wasn’t even good.”

“When no one likes the legislation, you have to do it different,” Jordan said. “It wasn’t going to bring down premiums — it had a host of problems. And frankly, the key promise we made to the American people in the 2010, 2014, and 2016 election[s] was we would repeal Obamacare, this legislation didn’t do that. And that was the fundamental flaw in this entire process. So let’s get back to work and let’s do what we said we would do.”

Jordan went on to say that the House Freedom Caucus was completely united on the 2015 clean Obamacare repeal bill that was passed in both the House and Senate and was sent to Obama’s desk.

But instead of starting with the “perfect,” Paul Ryan and his team of RINOs stupidly crafted a turd sandwich behind closed doors first and somehow thought it would pass muster with principled conservatives who were excluded from the writing of the legislation.

President Trump, as the author of “Art of the Deal” should know, this is exactly the opposite way a negotiation should have been constructed.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All, sneakypete, hondo68 (#0)

It's quite annoying to hear all these RINOs race to the cameras and mangle metaphors about "allowing the perfect to be the enemy of the good."

Then these addled ninnies confuse themselves by having to recite this talking point over and over and then they end up blathering about letting the good become the enema of the perfect. Or some such crap. They're confused people, not very bright. And they're very very angry to be exposed for what they really are.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-27   17:52:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative (#0)

Want a clean repeal bill and health bill and tax bill and everything-else bill?

Easy. Mitch McConnell: suspend the filibuster rule and ram through all of the legislation in a Republican majority Senate. There. Done. No negotiation with Democrats at all. No ability to stop anything.

If the Republicans are right, their programs, fully enacted, will unleash great prosperity, and they'll never lose another election because they'll control the whole budget, everything.

Truth is, the bulk of Republicans are NOT on the side of the people. They are crony capitalists who want tax breaks for the rich and stockjobbing contracts that privatize the government on a for-profit basis for the well- connected.

There are more Republican legislators like that than there are Republican populists are true-blue conservatives. Unfortunately, sand is running through the hour glass. The GOP was elected on Trump's coattails. HE was elected to do things the bulk of the traditional GOP does not want. But they have to swallow their desires and follow him. Or they can resist, divide, fail, and be replaced by Democrats.

You can be sure that if the DEMOCRATS take back power, THEY will maintain party discipline, kill the filibuster and ram through their whole agenda.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-03-27   17:59:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

Truth is, the bulk of Republicans are NOT on the side of the people.

Don't pretend the Dems are any better. They represent a lot of profiteers as well, probably more than the GOP does at present.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-27   18:03:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All, misterwhite (#0)

Notice Jordan saying here that the House Freedom Caucus was united on starting with the 2015 bill passed in both chambers and then following up with another 'replace' bill.

But Ryan refused to offer the House the same bill written by Tom Price. Because it was the RINOs who wouldn't vote for it again. The Freedom Caucus was ready before and is still ready to vote for the 2015 Price bill.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-27   18:08:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Tooconservative (#3)

Don't pretend the Dems are any better.

Well, the Dems want single payer - that's better. Of course they want to use it to fund unlimited abortion too.

And the Dems want generous family leave. That's much better.

And the Dems don't keep trying to privatize Social Security, so they're better on that too.

On foreign policy they're equally incompetent as Republicans, and they both treat Israel better than they are willing to treat states of their own country, which is discouraging.

The Republicans could be better, but they just love money and power so very much they can't seem to accept that redistribution of SOME excess wealth is necessary to keep suffering down.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-03-27   18:16:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative, down with REAL Republicans, God bless the RINOs (#4) (Edited)

But Ryan refused to offer the House the same bill written by Tom Price. Because it was the RINOs who wouldn't vote for it again.

Those Republican house members who wouldn't vote for a clean repeal are in the majority, so they're not RINO's. They're the REAL majority Republican, ObamaCare lovers.

The minority Republicans who rejected Obamacare Lite are the RINO's. God bless the House Freedom Caucus and the other RINO's who killed Ryan/Trump commie care.

Down with the REAL Republicans, like Ryan, Trump, and Gatlin! The good news is that they lost, and that's an awesome trend which needs to continue.


The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

hondo68  posted on  2017-03-27   19:10:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tooconservative (#1)

And they're very very angry to be exposed for what they really are.

They are also terrified that the bags of cash are going to stop showing up on their doorsteps,and they will have to actually live off their salaries.

BOYCOTT PAYPAL AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNTS NOW! ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO,TOO!

ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-03-27   20:24:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

Truth is, the bulk of Republicans are NOT on the side of the people. They are crony capitalists who want tax breaks for the rich and stockjobbing contracts that privatize the government on a for-profit basis for the well- connected.

Preach it,brother,preach it!

We don't agree all that often,but we are in perfect agreement on that.

BOYCOTT PAYPAL AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNTS NOW! ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO,TOO!

ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-03-27   20:25:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vicomte13 (#5)

The Republicans could be better, but they just love money and power so very much they can't seem to accept that redistribution of SOME excess wealth is necessary to keep suffering down.

Don't kid yourself. NOBODY is greedier than the Dims. Nobody. They make the RINO's look like shoplifters by comparison.

BOYCOTT PAYPAL AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNTS NOW! ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO,TOO!

ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-03-27   20:27:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#4)

"The Freedom Caucus was ready before and is still ready to vote for the 2015 Price bill."

Again. What's the difference between the 2015 Price bill and what Trump proposed? Nothing. So I don't believe you or the Freedom Caucus.

As Ted Poe said, they'd vote against the Ten Commandments.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   11:38:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#10)

What's the difference between the 2015 Price bill and what Trump proposed? Nothing.

Fine. Bring it back for a vote and we'll find out who the chickenshit hypocrites in the House GOP really are. I'd bet the Freedom Caucus people would have no problem voting for it again. It's the RINOs that wouldn't vote for it. I think it was likely the RINOs that were going to spike it if it came to a vote.

On the Wall Street Jornal Report, an hour show on FNC on Saturday, one of their younger (fortyish) reporters had followed this and had a lot of contacts with House aides (he claimed). He said the RINOs were unhappy with it all along with a number of them looking for a reason to desert. As the Freedom Caucus kept insisting on the various repeal provisions (as they had all along), the RINOs got madder. The reporter said that by the time Ryan called Trump to let him cancel the bill, they didn't even have 100 votes left in favor of it. It wasn't just a loss by a few votes in the House, something they would have tried for like they did with the Pill Bill in 2004. It was an utter humiliation because they wanted to pass their own 0bamaCare but one that screwed a lot of working-class people in Red states to punish them for being dumb enough to trust Republicans would do what they campaigned for.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-28   12:28:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#11)

"The reporter said that by the time Ryan called Trump to let him cancel the bill, they didn't even have 100 votes left in favor of it."

How would that be any different than if the Freedom Caucus got their way and wrote the bill? That's what you want, right? Hardcore repeal and replace, slash and burn, out with the old and in with the new?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   13:26:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Tooconservative (#4)

"Notice Jordan saying here that the House Freedom Caucus was united on starting with the 2015 bill passed in both chambers and then following up with another 'replace' bill."

Again, no different than Trump who called the repeal bill Part I, regulatory rollback by the HHS secretary Part II, and the replace portion (which needs 60 votes) Part III.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   13:29:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: misterwhite (#10)

As Ted Poe said, they'd vote against the Ten Commandments.

Ted Poe would know, he was on the "inner circle" until he got wise and told them to go to Hell ...

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-28   13:52:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: misterwhite (#12) (Edited)

How would that be any different than if the Freedom Caucus got their way and wrote the bill? That's what you want, right? Hardcore repeal and replace, slash and burn, out with the old and in with the new?

Just bring back the Price bill from 2015 for a vote. That's all.

It passed both chambers then. And again in a veto override attempt.

Pass it again.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-28   13:59:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Gatlin (#14)

Republicans are real good at obstructing. The best, actually. And that comes from years and years of practice while in the minority.

Now that we control everything -- which they demanded -- they can't stop. If they're not obstructing Democrats, why, they'll switch to obstructing Republicans. They don't know how to govern, and they're demonstrating why they shouldn't be given the power to govern.

Nobody in the GOP leadership sat down with the Freedom Caucus before Trump introduced the bill and had a come-to-Jesus meeting with them? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   14:03:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Tooconservative (#15)

"Just bring back the Price bill from 2015 for a vote. That's all."

The 2015 Price bill is no different than what Trump offered. If it was, I'd agree with you. But it's not.

Republicans voted for the Price bill and 53 other similar bills because they knew Obama would veto them. Even if the 2015 Price bill was flawed, who cares? It's not going to pass anyways.

But when the 2015 Price bill was turned into a real bill by Trump, the Freedom Caucus got cold feet.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   14:09:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: misterwhite (#17)

But when the 2015 Price bill was turned into a real bill by Trump, the Freedom Caucus got cold feet.

They are not the same.

And the idea that Trump even read it is laughable.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-28   14:17:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Tooconservative (#18)

"They are not the same."

What do you know that I don't? If they are not the same then tell me the difference.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   15:45:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: misterwhite (#19)

Why don't we just glance at the text? The differences are glaring. Or are you too lazy or incompetent to find the bill for yourself?

H.R.2653 — 114th Congress (2015-2016), the American Health Care Reform Act of 2015

The list of changes is quite extensive. High-risk pools at the state level, extensive support for medical savings accounts, VA reform, tort reform, association plans (for self-insured and small businesses), and more.

That. Pass that. Like they did twice only 14 months ago.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-28   16:03:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Tooconservative (#20)

H.R.2653 — 114th Congress (2015-2016), the American Health Care Reform Act of 2015

That's not the Tom Price bill. That bill went nowhere.

I gave you the link to the Tom Price bill which Congress DID pass and looks just like what Trump proposed.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   16:52:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: misterwhite (#21)

No, it doesn't. Tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements aren't there and it is at least twice as expensive.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-28   17:51:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Tooconservative (#22)

"Tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements aren't there"

Where did you see "tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements" in the 2015 Tom Price bill?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-28   18:43:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: misterwhite (#23) (Edited)

Where did you see "tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements" in the 2015 Tom Price bill?

Here, for instance:

. . . TITLE III—INTERSTATE MARKET FOR HEALTH INSURANCE


Sec. 301. Cooperative governing of individual health insurance coverage.


Sec. 401. Change in burden of proof based on compliance with clinical practice guidelines.

Sec. 402. State grants to create expert panels and administrative health care tribunals.

Sec. 403. Payment of damages and recovery of costs in health care lawsuits.

Sec. 404.  Definitions.

Sec. 405. Effect on other laws.

Sec. 406. Applicability; effective date.
. . .

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-28   19:25:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: misterwhite (#16)

They don't know how to govern, and they're demonstrating why they shouldn't be given the power to govern.

Yep ...

Gatlin  posted on  2017-03-28   21:37:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Tooconservative (#24)

Uh, no. That was "tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements" in a 2015 Tom Price bill (HR2300)that was introduced and went nowhere. You referred to the 2015 Tom Price bill that passed and was vetoed. THIS is the bill and I posted it to you once before:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/3762

No mention of "tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements". From now on, use HR3762.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   9:36:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: misterwhite (#26) (Edited)

Uh, no. That was "tort reform, interstate purchasing, and a lot of other elements" in a 2015 Tom Price bill (HR2300)that was introduced and went nowhere.

Just how many 0care repeal bills did Price write in 2015 anyway?

I see this one has a title of "Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act of 2015". Yet other reporting did indicate that its title was AHCRA.

At any rate, the Price bill does not go far enough. It will result in another 0bamaCare death spiral. But the GOP will own it 100% with the voters and the Dems will be happy to point out that the entire exercise was just so the GOP could deliver big tax cuts to the richest Americans (with a few tax cut scraps for middle-class Americans to go along with it). And the GOP has publicly admitted that this was just something to cut costs so they could make their tax cuts bigger while complying with budget law and reconciliation.

Trump should get on his knees and thank God for the Freedom Caucus spiking this atrocity of a bill. It fulfills every negative stereotype in the public's mind about the GOP.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-29   9:54:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Tooconservative (#27)

"Just how many 0care repeal bills did Price write in 2015 anyway?"

That went through the House and Senate and was vetoed by Obama? Just one.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   10:00:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Tooconservative (#27)

"At any rate, the Price bill does not go far enough."

Correct. But it goes as far as it can for a reconciliation bill. Which is why there is a Part II and a Part III to Trump's plan.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   10:10:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Tooconservative (#27)

"was just so the GOP could deliver big tax cuts to the richest Americans (with a few tax cut scraps for middle-class Americans to go along with it)."

"... big tax cuts to the richest Americans?" You should change your screen name to Tooliberal".

They get the biggest tax cuts because they pay the biggest taxes. You want to scrap a bill because the middle class gets a tax cut, but it's not as big?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   10:15:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: misterwhite (#30)

Me? I don't want any tax cuts until the national debt is paid down.

Neither should anyone else who actually gives a damn about the country.

OTOH, if you want to levy debts and taxes on children not even yet born to pay for your luxuries and your retirement, then I suppose you like it just fine.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-29   10:18:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Tooconservative (#31)

"Me? I don't want any tax cuts until the national debt is paid down."

Again, spoken like a liberal.

A "tax cut" is a tax rate cut. Reagan cut tax rates and tax income to the treasury increased.

Liberals think that's voodoo.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   10:54:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: misterwhite (#32)

Cut government spending, not tax rates.

You can cut taxes after the debt is reduced. And you stop robbing babies and unborn children by passing your debts on to them, ya deadbeat.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-29   11:57:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Tooconservative (#33)

"Cut government spending, not tax rates."

What else do you suggest? Is the deficit something we can "cut" our way out of?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   12:39:19 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: misterwhite (#34) (Edited)

For Trump's budget to mean much, he'd have to be willing to veto bills that spend more than he wants for given departments.

I'm not sure he will do that. This is why presidential budgets are routinely declared DOA on the Hill.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-29   14:04:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Tooconservative (#35)

For Trump's budget to mean much

When's the last time you saw a President propose a budget like that? Yet it's not good enough for you.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   16:19:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: misterwhite (#36) (Edited)

When's the last time you saw a President propose a budget like that? Yet it's not good enough for you.

That's all it is, a proposal.

But if Trump wants to hold the line on a budget, he has to be ready to veto. Right up to closing down the government if need be.

I assume you do know that it is Congress that sets spending. The prez can only veto specific spending bills and dare them to override him.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-29   17:17:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Tooconservative (#37)

"I assume you do know that it is Congress that sets spending."

Yes. But I thought we were discussing Trump.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-29   18:26:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: misterwhite (#38) (Edited)

Yes. But I thought we were discussing Trump.

That is because you somehow think everything is about your lord and savior, Donald Trump.

And Trump doesn't even care what is in the bill. "Forget about the little shit", is what he told the brave and wonderful Freedom Caucus when he went to the Hill to threaten them.

I was talking about Congress who is, after all, the only ones who can pass or repeal anything. Unlike you, I don't think Trump has read so much as a single page of RynoCare.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-03-29   22:57:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Tooconservative (#39)

"And Trump doesn't even care what is in the bill."

What bill? The budget bill? The healthcare bill? You're jumping all over the place.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-30   10:54:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 68) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com