[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

NOPD boots homeless drummer from his usual spot. It was legal, but shouldn't be.

Running of the Sheeple: Videos of Black Friday Brawls and Stampedes in America

Good Samaritans Shutdown, Ticketed for Feeding Homeless During Thanksgiving Holiday

How Jeff Sessions Plans to End Medical Marijuana Before the Year Is Over

5 Myths About Marijuana You Can Ignore (or laff at)

New Data (Again) Shows Fewer Kids Are Using Marijuana — Despite Legalization

Black Lives Matter Plans To Block White-Owned Businesses On Black Friday

I am The Field Artillery!

VA study shows parasite from Vietnam may be killing vets

Mom Arrested, Charged with Felony for Putting Recorder in 9-year-old's Backpack to Catch Her Bully

Trump ‘frightened by black people’

Judge Protects Former House Speaker and Admitted Child Rapist, Telling His Victim He Can’t Sue

Joe Barton apologizes after nude photo circulates on social media

How CBS News Aided the JFK Cover-up

6 Card Games Every Man Should Know

When Good-Faith Medicine Raises ‘Red Flags’

FBI Admits: Trump Dossier Filled With Nothing But Rumors

Type of alcohol determines whether you become merry or maudlin

Mysterious Marijuana-Related Illness Popping Up In Emergency Rooms

Wes Goodman: Anti-LGBT Republican politician 'caught having sex with man in his office' facing 30 sexual misconduct accusations

A Man Is About To Launch Himself In His Homemade Rocket To Prove The Earth Is Flat

Wrecked And Retching: Obscure Vomiting Illness Linked To Long-Term Pot Use

Family Calls 911 for Help, Cops Show Up, Beat Handcuffed Mentally Ill Man Instead

Police are using DNA mugshots to arrest innocent people

Confederate Flag Over NC Fire Department: ‘We’re Not Going To Take Down The Flag’

Thanksgiving for JFK

Police: Adults gave baby with broken leg marijuana; failed to seek treatment

Meet 'Oumuamua! The 1st Interstellar Visitor Ever Seen Gets a Name

Steve Martin's 'King Tut' Sketch Is Racist, Liberal Arts Students Say

Fake News Is Only the Beginning. The FCC Votes to Let Monopolies Decide What Local News You See

No, you’re not being paranoid. Sites really ARE watching your every move

JFK Files: The CIA Planned To Murder American Citizens In Miami And Blame It On Cuba During Operation Mongoose

Video So Gruesome, Cop Sentenced to 5 Years For Shooting Into Car of Teens, 16 Times

Study Debunks Feminism: Women Still Attracted to “Toxic Masculinity”

Student radio hosts yanked from air, suspended after using the word ‘tranny’

Cowboys, Truckers and Us

PV Police Chief's Gun Missing (Realizes he left it in the Library Bathroom, 4 days later)

General says he'd deny 'illegal' order for nuke strike

Happy Thanksgiving 2017!

Vegas Massacre Cover-Up: PR Firm Hired by Mandalay Bay Exposed Pushing Disinformation on Conspiracy Theories

20,000 DWI Cases May Be Thrown Out After Cop Arrested for Tampering With Breathalyzers

Country music legend Mel Tillis dead at 85

Helter skelter: The history of Charles Manson and rock 'n' roll

Grant Cardone was at Mandalay Hotel and he doesn't believe the official story

How a government-sanctioned scam in Newburgh Heights has taken thousands of dollars from drivers

The Cops Were Chasing a Shoplifter. They Ended Up Destroying an Innocent Man's Home.

Amtrak train smashes car in New Hampshire after GPS directed driver onto tracks

Cooking Hamburgers With Thermite

Making Charcoal the Easy Way

Homemade Gunpowder, For Science!

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: It’s Not Trump They Hate—It’s Us!
Source: AmericanGreatness
URL Source: https://amgreatness.com/2017/08/17/not-trump-hate-us/
Published: Aug 17, 2017
Author: William B. Allen
Post Date: 2017-08-20 04:04:19 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 235
Comments: 9

A storm gathers over the United States, threatening to inundate the very foundations of our civic edifice. In the heat of recriminations over the events of Charlottesville it would be easy to divert attention from this underlying reality. But the dangers are so grave that no effort should be spared in seeking to identify it and to respond to it.

It is immaterial what President Trump thinks about the extreme Right or the extreme Left, for the simple reason that the campaign to resist Trump calculates really to accomplish the fall of something far more important than a president. We will understand this best if we revisit the months since last November’s election in a clearer light. For on the morning after the election everyone faced (whether acknowledged or not) the question of how to respond to that dramatic expression of public hopes.

The looming question was not whether to support President Trump. It was rather whether to vindicate the people of the United States in their conduct in this election. This question was important not only for those who opposed candidate Trump but also for those who supported him. As one of the former, I was acutely aware of the importance of the moment. Indeed, I may go further and acknowledge that I became a “Never Trumper” before the escalator reached the ground on the day Trump announced his candidacy.

So resolved was I in my principles that, in response to those who challenged me with the prospect that I had to choose between Trump and the Devil, I replied deliberately that I had rather see my country fail than sacrifice my settled understanding of what the public good required. Accordingly, the election of Donald Trump presented me with the opportunity to measure the extent of the principles I had embraced. While it may be enticing to imagine that a country, no less than an individual, ought to prefer noble failure to base success, it is nonetheless matter of grave practical significance just what obligations would flow in one or the other circumstance.

I did not hesitate to greet the outcome of the election as the authentic expression of the hopes of the people of the United States. Accordingly, I had no need to reconsider my long-standing commitment to defend the people’s authority in this regard, no matter whether I thought they erroneously sought the fulfillment of those hopes in any particular person or measure. In embracing the necessity to defend the expression of the people’s hopes, I understood that I must be obligated to defend the authority of the incumbent in the presidency without regard to any predilections I may have had in that regard.

As a result, I have never been embarrassed by the “how can you defend that man” attitude that prevails in the sustained media narrative. Nor am I embarrassed by that attitude in the aftermath of the events in Charlottesville. How much easier it is to adhere to the standards I recognize as binding in a case in which it may easily be seen that President Trump is quite correct in seeking to formulate a response that candidly acknowledges deep fissures in the society while resisting the desire to elevate “naming and shaming” into the official posture of the government. However important it is for individuals to adhere to “naming and shaming” as a necessary tool to sustain civilized relations (and I have previously written emphatically in support of that perspective), that responsibility cannot be assigned to any public office without fatally impairing its social utility in the hands of the people.

The truth, however, is that on this occasion the president is correct and his critics are wrong. They are wrong, partly, from misperceiving the character of the moment. And they are wrong partly from deliberately manipulating hatred of the president toward the surreptitious goal of defeating the public hopes expressed in the election. This is the crux of the matter. The extreme Left is unhappy with the people of the United States, and it is not too extreme to suggest that they hate them insofar as they regard them as differing in their hopes and ambitions from the future the extreme Left would project for such “deplorables.”

One can grasp this at least imaginatively if one will simply rehearse the events of the weekend of August 11-13, 2017 as they actually unfolded. Responding to a symbolically significant public action to remove statutes from a public park and to rename the park in honor of the slaves freed by the Civil War, white nationalists prepared and announced a protest. They intended that the city and the nation would behold them expressing resistance to the notion that society in the United States might close the book on the affectation that the defenders of slavery were defending honor and decency. They laid claim to the protections of the First amendment to the Constitution and to the lawful processes of licensing and permitting to stage this public demonstration. They expected a confrontation and came equipped to engage in one, including arms. They expected also, however, the protection of public authorities, whose duty it was to prevent confrontation turning into conflict.

At the same time, leftist organizers planned to assemble and protest the protesters, laying claim to the protections of the First Amendment no less confidently. They too expected a confrontation and came equipped to engage in one. Their goal was to speak not only to the municipality but the entire nation in an act of “naming and shaming.”

And the confrontation and the conflict came. Long before the murder, the scene had become one of ugly confrontation, superintended but not prevented by the local and state police.

So far, so good. There was a third party to this drama, however, and that consisted of the state and municipal authorities who were fully informed of and prepared for the looming confrontation. They had the responsibility to ensure that confrontation would not descend into conflict. The usual method of accomplishing this result is to maintain effective separation between the protesting groups. In this the authorities failed miserably. But why did they fail? Were there efforts inadequate? Or, did they not make the effort at all?

We begin to comprehend the dynamics of that eventful weekend when we admit one other dramatic fact that stares us in the face: two groups mutually antagonistic and well prepared with weapons to do harm to one another engaged, with violent conflict resulting but without a single weapon being fired! This singular restraint teaches a great deal about what actually transpired. Despite the wild card of a single individual flying off the leash and driving a car into a crowd with murderous effect, the overall demonstrations were colored by a determination not to proceed to extreme conduct. And this determination acted so powerfully that, even while authorities (by shrinking from preventing direct conflict) invited them to do their worst, they nevertheless did not do so. The calculation on both sides, apparently, was that it was sufficient on this occasion to garner propaganda material.

This recitation makes it unnecessary to inquire who threw the first punch. And so the president did not do so. That he became the target of reproach, then, rather than the negligent (or culpable) local and state officials, speaks volumes. Anyone might credibly imagine that responsible authorities were in on the plan to exploit this occasion in order to advance an agenda that, while blaming racism, would actually serve to undermine the credibility of the public voice expressed in the election. The drumbeat for “naming and shaming” that has followed since only amplifies this appearance. And the local and state authorities have been among the loudest declaimers!

We do not need to search for previous comparisons in order to evaluate the present circumstance. We need only pay attention to the NPR or other media focus to observe the complete absence of any attention to the question of who was responsible for allowing matters to get out of control and the correlatively intense focus on what the president’s reaction says about the nation. Then we may clearly apprehend that the game here is to disorient the society, repudiate the people’s express hopes, and pave the way for a United States disconnected from the people’s legitimate authority. It is not Trump that they hate; it is us!

W. B. Allen is Emeritus Professor of Political Philosophy at Michigan State University and a Pastor at First Baptist Church, Havre de Grace, MD, USA. He was a member of the National Council on the Humanities 1984–87 and chairman of the United States Commission on Civil Rights from 1988 to 1989.

Poster Comment:

A black Republican who was a NeverTrumper weighs in.

He all but accuses the local authorities (police, Dem mayor, Dem governor) of creating the entire situation in Charlotte.(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)

It’s Not Trump They Hate—It’s Us!

Trump makes it easy to hate us because he has surrounded himself with people who hate us. His daughter and husband Jarhead and Tillerson are examples.

rlk  posted on  2017-08-20   5:13:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: rlk (#1) (Edited)

I thought the writer was pointing the blame at the Dem mayor of Charlotte and Dem governor of NC and at the police and the state police under their control who appear to have caused this situation where one lone wingnut rammed his car into protesters. This was the point of the article.

And he says that the brouhaha since has been all about whether Trump said some magic words after the event. It doesn't matter what Trump said. It's what the mayor and the governor did and about that driver who mowed people down.

And the libmedia just uses it all as another pretext to attack Trump, as though he planned it all. And the objective is to delegitimize the election and Trump himself.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-08-20   7:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: Tooconservative, awful McAuliffe (#2)

pointing the blame at the Dem mayor of Charlotte and Dem governor of NC

He's opposed to Trump appointing NC governor Roy Cooper to the commission to help fight opioid addiction?

Wrong town, wrong governor, wrong State. CHARLOTTESVILLE is in Virginia, birthplace of Robert E. Lee. The Republican candidate was so awful, that Terry McAuliffe was elected governor of Virginia.

The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

hondo68  posted on  2017-08-20   8:48:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: hondo68 (#3) (Edited)

Wrong town, wrong governor, wrong State.

You're right. Not enough sleep, not enough coffee.

I was thinking Charlottesville but wrote Charlotte for some reason. Now that I think about it, I may have written Charlottesburg a few times on similar threads. Virginia and North Carolina do have Dem governors and Charlottesville and Charlotte do both have Dem mayors.

I don't know who the hell this Charlotte was but she musta been one hot bitch back in the day.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-08-20   9:07:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#5. To: rlk (#1)

Trump makes it easy to hate us because he has surrounded himself with people who hate us. His daughter and husband Jarhead and Tillerson are examples.

Rather than reject that asinine statement out of hand (as I would if it came from other posters on this forum), I'm willing to listen. Can you give me some examples of behavior which make you believe that Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner and Rex Tillerson hate us?

Secondly, what if they do? They don't write policy. Trump does.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-20   10:46:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#6. To: Tooconservative (#0)

He all but accuses the local authorities (police, Dem mayor, Dem governor) of creating the entire situation in Charlotte(sville).

Someone should. Had Antifa not shown up, had the mayor not allowed them into the same f**king park, had the police placed themselves between the two groups, it would have been a peaceful free speech protest against the removal of Confederate statues.

People on the right should be screaming this every opportunity they get.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-20   10:54:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#7. To: misterwhite (#6)

Someone should. Had Antifa not shown up, had the mayor not allowed them into the same f**king park, had the police placed themselves between the two groups, it would have been a peaceful free speech protest against the removal of Confederate statues.

I agree.

People on the right should be screaming this every opportunity they get.

Don't be silly. If you try to do that on Big Social, you can be branded a neo-Nazi or hater and your access terminated. Cut a few ringleaders out of the herd to make an example by banning them. Then your average minion of Big Social will toe the line, fearing loss of their account at some future date if they are inadequately loyal to The Party Agenda. And so it becomes a numbers game, banning the most strident and those with a talent for leadership, try to force the remaining herd to stay for the perks granted by the overlords of Twitter/Facebook/Google.

Don't speak up against the Left or we won't let you play Farmville anymore.

Now bake me that goddamned cake!

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-08-20   11:33:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#8. To: Tooconservative (#7)

Don't speak up against the Left or we won't let you play Farmville anymore.

I live on a farm and there's very little "play" involved.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-20   11:42:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#9. To: misterwhite (#8)

I live on a farm and there's very little "play" involved.

Yeah, right. Your whole life is one happy-go-lucky game of Farmville.

Until Mother Nature, that dirty bitch, rears her ugly head...

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-08-20   12:08:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com