[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Personal Injury Attorney San Diego

obama daughter has white boyfriend -- people are pissed

Rex Tillerson at Hoover (Sec. of State Extravaganza with Condoleezza Rice)

Trump backs 'limited amnesty' for illegal immigrants

Police union slashes number of ‘get out of jail free’ cards issued

I think people should understand how jobs for illegal immgrants works

Democrats roll over and pee on their bellies like the submissive dogs they are

Claim: Hawaii Charter Boat Group Witnessed Explosion In The Sky On The Morning Of False Ballistic Missile Alert

Trump Signs Bill Renewing Warrantless NSA Surveillance

Cops Tase, Assault Handicapped VetThen Arrest Him For Half a Gram of Cannabis

Innocent Man Records Cops Stalking His House, Disabling His Cameras

Meeting Netanyahu, Pence receives welcome reserved for heads of stat

Scientists worry brain-wasting zombie deer disease could spread to humans

NSA "Sincerely Regrets" Deleting All Bush-Era Surveillance Data It Was Ordered To Preserve

Top Ten Reasons to Celebrate Trumps First Year

Up to 3.6 million Dreamers in line for citizenship under DACA replacement

The Republican Rally

Trump ad: Democrats complicit for every murder committed by illegal immigrants.

Flu outbreak: 100 people a week dying in US as virus continues to spread

UH-OH: Democrats Panic After Mainstream Media Sources Blame THEM For Government Shutdown

FEDS: Surge In DACA Recipients Losing Protections For Crimes, Thousands Convicted Or Charged

Oh, by the way...Turkey just invaded Syria

Why India is falling in love with a movie about toilets

5 million Ghanaians defecate openly daily, 1.1bn globally

Why isn't there chaos in the streets?

The Heart of the Constitution

Rand Paul Pushes Marijuana Amendments On Funding Bill

Congressional leaders refuse to budge on shutdown's first day, but negotiations continue

Some African Countries Are Excrement Holes, So Is Haiti

Can Cannabis Oil Really Treat Seizures?

Britons in Jamaica's Montego Bay urged to stay in resorts

Tom Petty died of accidental drug overdose, coroner and family say [opioids, fetanyl]

Fact Check: Is the 'FBI Investigating Whether Russian Went to NRA to Help Trump'?

Reversing the Damage Done by Chairman Barack

Republican Congressman Admits Drug War HELPS Cartels, Slams Weed Witch Hunt

Elizabeth Warrens Native American problem goes beyond politics

In 2018 The US Government Will Spend Nearly $2 Billion a Day on War

Question Concerning Government Shutdown

Neighbor accused of breaking Rand Pauls ribs will plead guilty to felony assault (on a member of congress, resulting in personal injury)

The rise of the cannabis cult: dont believe the hype about medical marijuana Health ..

Happiness

Tim Ogle: This Guys Device Got 100 Miles Per Gallon Then He Had An Attempt On His Life & Later Mysteriously Died

Real Federalists Need to Step Up to Fight Jeff Sessions' War on Weed

Government-Approved Workouts? The Fight Against Fitness Licensing.

Tennessee's Haircut Cops Bust Barbers Who Lack High School Diplomas

Dashcam Recording Instantly Undercuts Officers' Concocted Reason For A Traffic Stop

Medical Marijuana Isnt a Miracle Drug

'Shoot black kids' smoking weed, police chief advises recruit

Putin's Master Plan to Install a Pawn In the White House Who Would Greatly Amp Up Energy Production and Thereby Decimate the Russian Oil-Based Economy Is Nearly Complete

Gas tax should rise 25 cents to fund road repair: US Chamber of Commerce (Communists)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: From Duty to be Armed to Permission to Carry (Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 - HR 38)
Source: TenthAmendmentCenter
URL Source: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/201 ... -armed-to-permission-to-carry/
Published: Dec 11, 2017
Author: Publius Huldah
Post Date: 2017-12-11 14:28:21 by hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 116
Comments: 18

“If the central government has the authority to tell a state it must accept permits from all the other states, then it also has the authority to tell a state it may not accept a concealed permit from any other states. If the central government can do these things it can set up a national concealed carry permit scheme and in essence bring into existence a national arms registry. That is exactly where this is headed.”
-Attorney Richard D. Fry 1

Some are touting the federal Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (HR 38) as a bill which would expand our right to carry. But if you will walk with me for a few minutes, I’ll show you a better path to take.

Let us look at the applicable First Principles, to which I propose we return.

1. Gun control is not an enumerated power delegated to the federal government

Our federal Constitution doesn’t delegate to the federal government any power over the Country at Large 2 to restrict our arms. Accordingly, all pretended federal laws, regulations, orders, opinions, or treaties which purport to do so are unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated. They are also unconstitutional as in violation of the Second Amendment.

The only power the federal government has over the Country at Large respecting arms is set forth at Article I, §8, clause 16 with respect to providing for the “organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia”. Pursuant to this clause, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1792 which required every able-bodied male citizen (with a few exceptions) between the ages of 18 and 45 to acquire a rifle, bayonet, ammo, ammo pouch, and report to his local Militia Unit for training. 3

2. What does your State Constitution say about the right to keep and bear arms?

Each State has its own Constitution which addresses its State Militia and the right to be armed.

Now listen: No State may lawfully make any law which contradicts its State Constitution or which interferes with Congress’ power to “organize, arm, and discipline, the Militia”.

Accordingly, any State Statute which purports to require a permit before one may carry a gun is probably unconstitutional under that State’s Constitution; and is certainly unconstitutional under the federal Constitution because Congress may lawfully require able-bodied male Citizens to acquire firearms and ammo and report to their local Militia Unit for training.

Do you see?

Now let’s look at Title 18, US Code, Part I, Chapter 44, which HR 38 proposes to amend.

3. Title 18, US Code, Part I, Chapter 44 is unconstitutional

It sets up a complex federal regulatory scheme over firearms, every word of which is unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated, and as in violation of the Second Amendment.

HERE it is, look through it (§§ 921-931).

4. What HR 38 actually does

HR 38 proposes to amend this existing federal regulatory scheme to insert a new provision [to be § 926 D] to require States which have a statute which permits residents of their State to apply for a permit [!] to carry a concealed firearm

to allow persons from other States:

· who aren’t prohibited by federal law from possessing firearms [!]; and

· who are carrying a photographic ID issued by a government body [!]; and

· who are carrying a concealed carry license or permit from the other State [!],

to possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or “destructive device”) which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

So, even though a State Constitution, such as that for Connecticut, 4 prohibits the State Legislature from making ANY laws restricting firearms (such as imposing requirements for registration, a permit, government issued photo ID), a Citizen of Connecticut who exercises his constitutionally recognized right to carry without registration or a permit or a government issued photo ID, wouldn’t qualify under HR 38 for concealed carry in another State.

To qualify for concealed carry in other States, the Citizen of Connecticut would need his State Legislature to pass a law [which is unconstitutional under the Connecticut and federal Constitutions], so that he could comply with an unconstitutional federal statute [HR 38], so that he could carry in other States which also would have to pass unconstitutional laws imposing permit requirements on those who carry concealed.

Do you see how a God-given right [self-defense] is thus converted into a privilege which is regulated, granted, or denied, by civil government?

HR 38 also provides that any person carrying a concealed handgun in a State under the reciprocity provisions may also carry concealed in the public parts of National Parks and certain other lands under federal control. Lest you think this a gain, consider that: (1) The Constitution doesn’t authorize the federal government to operate national parks and such like, and (2) the federal government has no lawful authority to impose registration requirements for carrying arms anywhere.

5. What’s the solution?

Read our Declaration of Independence and federal Constitution. Then you won’t fall for unconstitutional gimmicks like HR 38.

The gun rights organizations could perform valuable services to our Country by working for:

· the repeal of the entire unconstitutional federal regulatory scheme respecting arms;

· the repeal of all unconstitutional State regulatory schemes;

· the revitalization of the State Militia to replace the federally controlled National Guard; 5 and

· by providing more classes for Citizens in arms training.

And please stop lobbying for unconstitutional federal legislation!

Endnotes:

1 From the late Attorney Richard D. Fry’s email of Dec. 10, 2015 to US Senator Moran, a co-sponsor of SB 498, the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2015. Richard, who was my Friend, sent me a copy of his letter.

2 Pursuant to Article I, § 8, next to last clause, Congress has general legislative powers over the District of Columbia, military bases, dock yards, mints, federal courthouses and post offices, and such other places needed for Congress to exercise its enumerated powers. The exercise of such powers by Congress over these small federal enclaves is restricted by the Bill of Rights – including the 2nd Amendment. So Congress is prohibited from making, for these federal enclaves, any laws which infringe the Right of The People to keep and bear Arms. Congress may properly require individuals visiting federal prisons, the psych ward of military hospitals, the mint, federal courthouses, and such like, to leave their arms in their vehicles. But Congress may not require Citizens to obtain and carry a permit or photo ID as a condition precedent to carrying a firearm.

3 The “Militia of the several States” were creatures of State Statutes – not of the federal government. Dr. Edwin Vieira’s short videoshows how the State Militia were replaced by the federally controlled National Guard.

4 The Constitution of the State of Connecticut says at Article I: “SEC. 15. Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state.”

5 See A SERIOUS QUESTION FOR THE NRA, by Dr. Edwin Vieira, re revitalization of the Militia of the several States. Dr. Vieira’s mind is a delight. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: hondo68, y'all (#0)

If the central government has the authority to tell a state it must accept permits from all the other states, then it also has the authority to tell a state it may not accept a concealed permit from any other states. If the central government can do these things it can set up a national concealed carry permit scheme and in essence bring into existence a national arms registry. That is exactly where this is headed.” -Attorney Richard D. Fry 1

Some are touting the federal Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (HR 38) as a bill which would expand our right to carry. But if you will walk with me for a few minutes, I’ll show you a better path to take.

Let us look at the applicable First Principles, to which I propose we return.

1. Gun control is not an enumerated power delegated to the federal government

Our federal Constitution doesn’t delegate to the federal government any power over the Country at Large 2 to restrict our arms. Accordingly, all pretended federal laws, regulations, orders, opinions, or treaties which purport to do so are unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated. They are also unconstitutional as in violation of the Second Amendment.

I posted this recently on another thread: ---

Our inalienable rights to bear arms canNOT be infringed. -- - Unconstitutional laws that attempt to do so (and granted, there are thousands) are tolerated because they are rarely enforced to the point of being infringements.

--- We are a nation of scofflaws on many levels, guns, booze, gambling, drugs, etc... And that's what the founders intended, --- we are free to live our lives unencumbered by petty bureaucracy... At our own peril.

tpaine  posted on  2017-12-11   14:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: hondo68 (#0)

Our federal Constitution doesn’t delegate to the federal government any power over the Country at Large 2 to restrict our arms.

Sure it does. Guns are commerce, right? Doesn't Congress have the power to regulate interstate commerce? Or are you saying the Gun Control Act of 1968 is unconstitutional?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-11   17:30:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: hondo68 (#0)

and is certainly unconstitutional under the federal Constitution because Congress may lawfully require able-bodied male Citizens to acquire firearms and ammo and report to their local Militia Unit for training.

No. The Militia Act of 1792 required Militia members to acquire firearms and ammo. Many showed up for duty without arms.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-11   17:33:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: hondo68 (#0)

Do you see how a God-given right [self-defense] is thus converted into a privilege which is regulated, granted, or denied, by civil government?

Nope. Your God-given right to self-defense is not affected at all. Your right to self-defense with a weapon, however, is regulated by the state.

I mean, if self-defense with a gun is an inalienable, God-given right, then everyone could have one -- children, the insane, felons, illegal aliens, foreign visitors.

We regulate the first amendment. We can regulate the second.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-11   17:42:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite, Calypso Louie Farrakhan, Bill Ayers 1st amendment (#4)

We regulate the first amendment.

That's your personal preference to kiss Bill Ayers and Calypso Louie Farrakhan’s azzes in the Land 'O Lincoln!

hondo68  posted on  2017-12-11   18:10:40 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite, -- a slave to the gun grabbing lobby. (#4)

hondo68 ---- Do you see how a God-given right [self-defense] is thus converted into a privilege which is regulated, granted, or denied, by civil government?

misterwhite opines: ---

Nope. Your God-given right to self-defense is not affected at all. Your right to self-defense with a weapon, however, is regulated by the state.

I mean, if self-defense with a gun is an inalienable, God-given right, then everyone could have one -- children, the insane, felons, illegal aliens, foreign visitors.

We regulate the first amendment. We can regulate the second.

Our inalienable Constitutional rights apply to everyone in the USA, -- however, children, the insane, felons, illegal aliens, foreign visitors, etc, have been deemed to be temporarily incapable of exercising the full responsibilities, the inalienable rights of a citizen. --- Thus, misterwhite once again shows us his gun grabbing agenda...

--- "Our federal Constitution doesn’t delegate to the federal government any power over the Country at Large 2 to restrict our arms. Accordingly, all pretended federal laws, regulations, orders, opinions, or treaties which purport to do so are unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated. They are also unconstitutional as in violation of the Second Amendment. "

Our inalienable rights to bear arms CANNOT be infringed. -- - Unconstitutional laws that attempt to do so (and granted, there are thousands) are tolerated because they are rarely enforced to the point of being infringements.

tpaine  posted on  2017-12-11   19:51:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: tpaine (#6)

Those that fantasize the most about " gun confiscation ", don't have the balls to do it themselves !!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)

Stoner  posted on  2017-12-12   10:03:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: hondo68 (#5)

You have much more in common with Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground than I ever could.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-12   10:38:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Stoner, --- and misterwhite, who lies a lot... (#7)

Those that fantasize the most about " gun confiscation ", don't have the balls to do it themselves !!

Exactly. --- In an idiotic effort to prove that guns can be confiscated, --- misterwhite opines: --- "If self-defense with a gun is an inalienable, God-given right, then everyone could have one -- children, the insane, felons, illegal aliens, foreign visitors."

Our inalienable Constitutional rights apply to everyone in the USA, -- however, children, the insane, felons, illegal aliens, foreign visitors, etc, have been deemed to be temporarily incapable of exercising the full responsibilities, the inalienable rights of a citizen.

--- Thus, misterwhite once again shows us his cowardly agenda... He has no shame, no honor.

tpaine  posted on  2017-12-12   10:51:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: tpaine (#9)

" In an idiotic effort to prove that guns can be confiscated, --- misterwhite opines: "

Yeah, like most, when the orders go out, he would sit in the rear running his mouth, but would not have the balls to go and kick down doors himself to confiscate weapons. That would be dangerous.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)

Stoner  posted on  2017-12-12   13:38:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Stoner (#10)

but would not have the balls to go and kick down doors himself to confiscate weapons.

So you're saying YOU have the balls to kick down doors and take weapons away from people. Oh, you must be so proud.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-12   14:22:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: misterwhite, Sharia Law Professor, Chicago PD Academy (#8)

You have much more in common with Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground

CONFIRMED

You're a Sharia Law Professor at the Nation Of Islam, Chicago Police Academy!

Is that you to the right of Colin?

hondo68  posted on  2017-12-12   15:46:20 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: hondo68 (#12)

Is that you to the right of Colin?

I'm to the right of just about everyone.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-12   16:53:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: misterwhite (#11)

" So you're saying YOU have the balls to kick down doors and take weapons away from people. "

No. Because I do not advocate taking weapons away from law abiding citizens. I believe in the 2nd Amendment - that is what I am proud of !!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)

Stoner  posted on  2017-12-12   20:09:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: misterwhite, -- a slave to the gun grabbing lobby, and a congenital liar. (#11)

- In an idiotic effort to prove that guns can be confiscated, --- misterwhite opines: --- "If self-defense with a gun is an inalienable, God-given right, then everyone could have one -- children, the insane, felons, illegal aliens, foreign visitors."

Stoner --- (misterwhite) would not have the balls to go and kick down doors himself to confiscate weapons.

So you're saying YOU have the balls to kick down doors and take weapons away from people. Oh, you must be so proud. --- misterwhite

As usual, misterwhite lies about Stoners position. --- Neither Stoner nor I advocate weapons confiscation.

According to misterwhite, the government has the power to confiscate arms because their possession is NOT our inalienable right...

tpaine  posted on  2017-12-13   8:37:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: hondo68, and misterwhite, -- a slave to the gun grabbing lobby, and a congenital liar. (#13)

hondo68 (#12) --- Is that you to the right of Colin?

I'm to the right of just about everyone. --- misterwhite

Get another silly, self aggrandizing lie, from a gun grabbing closet socialist.

tpaine  posted on  2017-12-13   8:43:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: hondo68 (#12)

You're a Sharia Law Professor at the Nation Of Islam, Chicago Police Academy!

More irony.

Hondo, who supported pro-Sharia, pro-Dem, pro-homofascist baby-killer, Doug Jones AND Hillary.

Light up another Fat-Boy, Cheech.

Liberator  posted on  2017-12-13   9:13:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Stoner (#14)

No. Because I do not advocate taking weapons away from law abiding citizens.

Nah. I say you don't have the balls.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-12-13   12:11:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com