[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The Army Took Over the Spigots, Forcing Thirst y Venezuelans to Pay (Showing Marxism's Finest Hour)

Maxine Waters orders MORE public harassment of Trump aides: ‘God is on OUR side!’

I'm back

Woman dubbed '#PermitPatty' appears to call cops on 8-year-old girl selling water in viral video

Freedom’s Essential Hierarchy

DOJ gives Congress new classified documents on Russia probe

What Purpose Do Mosquitoes Serve?

Restaurant That Booted Sanders Closes the Next Night

The FR Griftathon Continues

Henry Kissinger’s Kind Words About President Trump: Tactical Strategy Or Hope?

Citizenship Checkpoints Start to Spread Across The Constitution-Free Zone

Poof. There Goes the Mueller Investigation

Lawsuit Argues Honking Your Car Horn Is Protected By The First Amendment

Cops Break Into Innocent Man’s Yard, Kill His Dog, Steal His Body, Then Urinate On His Fence

'I always do my best to treat people respectfully, including those I disagree with': Sarah Sanders slams owner of restaurant who kicked out her and seven members of her family because she 'works for the president'

Three FBI Cadets

Retrospective: UNBELIEVABLE OBAMA GAFFES, Mistakes, Lies, and Confusion (as worshipful MSM still drooled over their idiotic "genius" & "cool" Prez anyway)

Trump Valiantly Tried to Save America

John McAfee says he has been poisoned, and tells culprits: 'You will soon understand the true meaning of wrath'

The Prisoner (All 17 Episodes)

Huge Win for Everyone With a Cellphone (and for the Fourth Amendment) at the Supreme Court

The Best Places To Live In All 50 U.S. States

Mad Dog Mattis, the destroyer of Raqqa, frets about losing moral authority

What Kind of Country Are We?

Will Our Lack of Humanity Be the END of Humanity?

Hypocrisy

Evangelical Nevada Voters Back Trump-Praising Brothel Owner; 'I Want to Hurl,' CWA President Penny Nance Says

Time Magazine Corrects Cover Story on Crying Migrant Girl, Admits Family Was Never Separated

A mystery: Italy seizing migrant rescue ships, but who owns them? [Soros]

Tom Arnold says he's teaming up with Michael Cohen and 'taking Trump down'

Hoops legend Kevin McHale slammed for apparently attending Trump rally: ‘He should never work in the NBA again’

David Hogg Reappears to Take Another Stab at Destroying Laura Ingraham’s Career

Justice Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch levy internet taxes

Bombs Away! US Airstrikes Every 12 Minutes?

VULGAR OPEN-BORDERS MEDIA-HOLLYWOOD LIBERALS-DEMOCRATS DECLARE TOTAL WAR ON AMERICA & TRUMP (**MSM DIVERSIONS CREATED TO STOP SCRUTINY OF 0BAMA COUP INVOLVEMENT**)

Anti-Trump media moves goal posts after executive order in 'shameful' display of bias

Bypassing Facebook on the dark web

Bannon, Salvini, And A Powerful Catholic Cardinal Are Gunning For Pope Francis

DOJ requests military lawyers to help prosecute immigration crimes: report

Canada legalizes marijuana, sales to start on October 17

Will the Real Donald Trump Please Stand Up?

WHY CAN’T WE SUE THE TSA FOR ASSAULT?

WATCH VIDEO: Muslim calls flight attendant a ‘fucking slut*’ and a ‘bitch for serving him what he thinks is pork – “She should have respected my religion”

James Comey And Peter Strzok Walk Into A Courtroom And Meet The America They Sold Out

Barack Obama: Liar And Nation Wrecker

Islamic Takeover Of America!

What Trump Gets Right About Europe

America the beautiful

"I'm 81 and I'm Tired"

Rachel Maddow Breaks Down in Tears Delivering News of Migrant Babies Being Detained


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Ballot Integrity Law
Source: RedState
URL Source: https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20 ... ds-ohios-ballot-integrity-law/
Published: Jun 11, 2018
Author: streiff
Post Date: 2018-06-11 11:00:35 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 202
Comments: 9

In 2015, a guy named Larry Harmon showed up to vote on a local initiative. Harmon’s problem was the last time he cast a vote was in 2008 and he was sort of sloppy about even reading his mail. He wasn’t on the voter roll, and, as far as I can make out, was not allowed to vote. (A brief side trip here. I’m chief judge in a voting precinct. I have been for six years. In my state I would have issued Harmon a provisional ballot. He would have cast it. The Board of Elections would have examined his ballot the week after the election. They would determine that he was eligible to vote and added his ballot to the total and put him back on the voter rolls for next election. A 100% no-harm-no-foul situation. I don’t know how Ohio works this issue.)

Keeping with their M.O. of ensuring the voting process is as open to abuse as they can make it, a leftwing advocacy group, the A. Philip Randolph Institute filed suit saying booting Harmon from the voter rolls was against federal law. The federal law say you can purge voting rolls, like by sending post cards, but you can’t use failure to vote as a reason to purge voters. Ohio prevailed in federal district court but 6th Circuit reversed saying that because the failure to vote triggered the mailing of the post card that it was actually Harmon’s failure to vote that got him booted and therefore violated federal law.

The case was argued before the Supreme Court in January and just now the Supreme Court has ruled, 5-4, in favor of Ohio.

Via SCOTUSBlog Live Blog:
The majority holds that Ohio’s process follows subsection (d) of the National Voter Registration Act “to the letter: It is undisputed that Ohio does not remove a registrant on change-of-residence grounds unless the registrant is sent and fails to mail back a return card and then fails to vote for an additional four years.”

Alito says that the dissenting justices have a policy disagreement, but that’s a matter for Congress; it is not up to the justices to second-guess Congress or decide whether there is a better way to keep the voter roles up to date.

Here is the decision.


Poster Comment:

The Court has definitely taken a strict textualist turn since Gorsuch arrived.

Gorsuch so far seems more of a strict textualist than even Scalia. He's out-Scaliaing Scalia.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)

Gorsuch so far seems more of a strict textualist than even Scalia. He's out-Scaliaing Scalia.

But NOT unfortunately on a recent key illegal immigration issue.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-11   11:49:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Liberator (#1)

But NOT unfortunately on a recent key illegal immigration issue.

If you look closely, that vote was based on a strict construction of the law as it is written.

Gorsuch intends to enforce the laws. If people don't like that, then Congress needs to change the laws and stop dumping all this half-baked partisan-hackery legislation in the laps of the Court.

The Court should not exist to "fix" the incompetence of Congress or its inability to conduct its lawful duties. If Gorsuch is marking out an area of judicial philosophy, that would be a succinct statement of it. And it is quite consistent with his record from his appeals court in Colorado. No one can claim it's a big surprise that he continues his established judicial philosophy on the Court.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-11   12:11:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tooconservative (#2)

If you look closely, that vote was based on a strict construction of the law as it is written.

I did. And it appeared *to me* to be a matter of over-stretching the benefit of doubt.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-11   12:22:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Liberator (#3)

I did. And it appeared *to me* to be a matter of over-stretching the benefit of doubt.

If given the chance, Gorsuch would probably spend some time to convince you that he judged the law as fairly and neutrally as he could, given the text of the law.

Kind of a stickler. It could come back to bite us but Scalia wasn't perfect either. He was wrong about Chevron deference for instance. And Gorsuch is absolutely opposed to that (alleged) principle of law that was...just made of up out of thin air by the courts.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-11   12:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Tooconservative (#4)

Scalia wasn't perfect either.

I know...His rep was that he *was* perfect.

Roberts 0ZeroCare decision jaded me and made me hyper-cynical of supposed by-the-book "constitutional" justices.

Fair or not, until push comes to shove on coming major issues, I'll probably reserve judgment on Gorsuch. I still feel his illegal invader interpretation of law was wrong.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-11   12:50:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Liberator (#5) (Edited)

Roberts 0ZeroCare decision jaded me and made me hyper-cynical of supposed by-the-book "constitutional" justices.

You may recall some of us always were suspicious of Roberts, "the perfect Bush judge". Two other Bush picks were Aunt Harriet (shot down by the Right) and Souter. Alito was the only good Bush judge but he isn't quite the jurist that Gorsuch is or Scalia was. Thomas is still greatly underestimated but he hits above his weight and has the merit of not having been a judge gunning for the Court his entire life. IOW, a little closer to being a regular American and more than a little suspicious of dictates delivered from On High by 9 hacks in robes. Every Court should have a skeptic.

Fair or not, until push comes to shove on coming major issues, I'll probably reserve judgment on Gorsuch. I still feel his illegal invader interpretation of law was wrong.

You may recall that he warned us specifically of this during his Senate confirmation hearings. He said he would defer to following the plain meaning of the text and that there were likely to be times he would disagree with his own ruling (politically) and that he expected he would issue some (more) decisions that were not "conservative" in some people's opinion. That case you mention is the main example of him operating that way on the Court. And he'll keep doing it so you should get used to it.

Or would you prefer to have Merrick Garland, like 0bama and Hitlery wanted?

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-11   13:33:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tooconservative (#6)

You may recall some of us always were suspicious of Roberts, "the perfect Bush judge". Two other Bush picks were Aunt Harriet (shot down by the Right) and Souter. Alito was the only good Bush judge but he isn't quite the jurist that Gorsuch is or Scalia was. Thomas is still greatly underestimated but he hits above his weight and has the merit of not having been a judge gunning for the Court his entire life. IOW, a little closer to being a regular American and more than a little suspicious of dictates delivered from On High by 9 hacks in robes. Every Court should have a skeptic.

Pretty much a spot on assessment.

Moreover, making Roberts, the rookie, Chief Justice was always conspicuously suspicious. What was that all about? Was *that* a signal that Roberts would be centrist/Trojan Horse on certain matters? (already proven)

Souter was obviously a Trojan Horse, another Bush/NWO betrayal who would side with the Left in order to maintain the ideological "balance" to assure Roe v Wade.

Thomas may be underestimated but not under-appreciated. You're right -- he's a magnificent cynic of the others and entire SCOTUS theater.

I would quibble only on the Alito assessment.

Scalia...I still find his death suspicious as well as the lack of curiosity and MSM inquisition AND rapid sweeping of the entire circumstance under the rug. Oh...and No autopsy.

Or would you prefer to have Merrick Garland, like 0bama and Hitlery wanted?

I don't think What-Ifs allay my uneasiness of Gorsuch. I hope you're right.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-11   16:04:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Liberator (#7)

Moreover, making Roberts, the rookie, Chief Justice was always conspicuously suspicious. What was that all about?

Bush, like any prez, wanted to make his mark with a Chief Justice. Most don't get the chance since it takes forever to get one to quit their job as Chief Dictator of the Robed Gang of Nine. They love the power.

Tooconservative  posted on  2018-06-11   16:40:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Liberator, Tooconservative (#1)

But NOT unfortunately on a recent key illegal immigration issue.

Unsure but I believe you are referring to Sessions v. Dimaya 15-1498 USSC (17 Apr 2018). If so, that is a case of deporting a lawful permanent resident, not an illegal alien. Kagan wrote the Opinion of the Court, which Gorsuch, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor joined.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1498_1b8e.pdf

nolu chan  posted on  2018-06-11   17:01:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com