[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Where Does the Constitution Call for Black-Robed Dictators?

Resisting the Campus Speech Nazis

Don’t Count on Americans Hating Each Other Any Less Post-Midterms

Justice Department reportedly preparing to charge Wikileaks' Julian Assange

Billionaire Uses $25 Million Yacht to Bring Supplies to Fire Victims But Police Don’t Let Him Ashore

HereÂ’s Why the NRA is Silent After Cops Killed a Legally Armed Black Man for Stopping a Mass Shooting

Ohio skin cancer survivor ticketed for tinted windows despite explaining health reasons

Interesting...California wildfires map lines up with proposed high speed rail for California

Financial Times tool warns if articles quote too many men

Liberal freak article The Ohio professor who's suing for the right to violate his LGBTQ students' rights

Near the Mexican border. Citizen reporter MEXICANS WILL FIGHT BACK not letting people exit buses

Michael Avenatti Arrested for Felony Domestic Violence

Fox News backs CNN in lawsuit against Trump White House

Judiciary Committee processes Trump nominees over Democrats' objections

Google bias

DOJ OLC Memo Re Designating an Acting Attorney General (14 Nov 2018) (Matthew Whitaker)

Trump has reportedly 'retreated into a cocoon of bitterness and resentment' after mounting midterm losses

Red Flag Gun Laws: Yet Another Government Weapon for Compliance and Control

The Toad and his minions met Monday to answer Mueller's questions:

Merkel calls for creation of ‘European army,’ backing Macron in spat with Trump

In their attempt to help ... the homeless - support liberals - stand for almost nothing hard to stand for --- they have become what they wanted - nothing.

Self-induced DISASTER: California fires the direct result of shortsighted environmentalist policies that prohibit forest management

CNN sues President Trump and White House for banning reporter Jim Acosta

As the US Spent $1.5 Million a Day to “Fight” Afghan Heroin Production, Heroin Output Quadrupled

Black security guard killed by police while he was stopping a bar shooting

Professor sues university for being ‘punished’ after calling female transgender student ‘sir’

They Hacked Their School District When They Were 12. The Adults Are Still Trying to Catch Up.

UN Demands Ban on Trump-style “Nationalist Populism”

12 targets as House Democrats prepare to investigate

MICHELLE O: LIKE, LIKE, YOU KNOW, LIKE, DUDE, YOU KNOW?

Jerry Brown: Climate-Change Deniers 'Definitely Contributing' to the 'New Abnormal' of Wildfires

Fastest growing religion is ‘none’

Giving Food to the Homeless Shouldn’t Be a Crime

Michelle Obama: ‘I stopped even trying to smile’ during Trump’s inauguration

114 warrants served across Maryland since ‘red flag’ law went into effect in October ('Take the guns first, go through due process second' )

The Toad Played Central Role in Hush Payoffs to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal

What is the textbook definition of a democrat

Putin's Favorite Congressman Is A Loser

DOJ Charges Hotel with Discrimination for not Hiring Immigrant in Fraud-Infested Asylum Program

Matthew Whitaker is a crackpot

Larry King: "CNN Stopped Doing News A Long Time Ago"

THE MOST EVIL HUMAN ON EARTH!

AP NewsBreak: Michelle Obama rips Trump in new book

CNN's Jim Acosta Was Rude, but He Did Not Assault a White House Intern

Judge Nap: Whitaker Not 'Legally Qualified' to Be Acting Attorney General

Rick Scott Sues Broward County and Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections

Ocasio-Cortez: “Puzzling” That Anyone Would Ask How I’ll Pay for Agenda

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized After Fracturing Three Ribs

D.C. Bureaucrats Are Trying to Make Parents Get a License to Let Children Play Together

American Citizen Detained by Trump Admin Without Charge for More than a Year Finally Set Free


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: And You Thought You Lived in a Free Society
Source: Lew Rockwell
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/06 ... t-you-lived-in-a-free-society/
Published: Jun 12, 2018
Author: Laurence M. Vance
Post Date: 2018-06-12 10:14:08 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 272
Comments: 10

Because they can vote for Tweedledum or Tweedledee, the red team or the blue team, or the welfare statist or the warfare statist, Americans think they live in a free society.

They sing that they are proud to be an American “where at least I know I’m free.” They sing the national anthem and roar when it comes to the line about America being “the land of the free.”

Are they free? Is it free?

I recently saw that the first legal bare-knuckle boxing bout in the United States was held in over a hundred years.

A sellout crowd of 2,000 fans plus a pay-per-view audience around the world watched ten bare-knuckle matches, including four heavyweight bouts, on June 2 at the Cheyenne Ice and Events Center on the outskirts of Cheyenne, Wyoming. The fight card included mixed-martial arts fighters, boxers, and street fighters. One of the bouts was between two women. Two doctors were at ringside and two ambulances were parked outside.

The fight rules are similar to professional boxing. Only punching is allowed. There is a referee. There are five, two-minute rounds. There is a standard eight-count and a three-knockdown rule in effect.

Seven of the ten fights were decided by knockout. Only three bouts went past the third round.

The promoter, David Feldman, a former boxer who worked for seven years to legalize bare-knuckle fighting, said he was rejected by 28 states before Wyoming finally agreed to sanction it. The Wyoming State Board of Mixed Martial Arts, created in 2012, gave approval for the bare-knuckle fighting in March.

So, what does the reintroduction of bare-knuckle boxing have to do with America being or not being a free society?

Everything.

No matter how poor, sick, or destitute a man is, if he owns anything, he owns his own body. The state doesn’t own it. Society doesn’t own it. The public doesn’t own it. And neither does some government agency or bureaucrat. As the owner of his body, he should be free to do whatever he wants with it as long as his activities are peaceful, his interactions are consensual, his associations are voluntary, and his actions don’t aggress against the person or property of anyone else.

He should be free to groom it, mutilate it, prostitute it, feed it, starve it, pierce it, strengthen it, cut it, disfigure it, tattoo it, deprive it, alter it, injure it, harm it, pamper it, neglect it, or otherwise use it as he sees fit. Again, as long as his activities are peaceful, his interactions are consensual, his associations are voluntary, and his actions don’t aggress against the person or property of anyone else.

Not being able to publicly, freely, voluntarily, and consensually engage in bare-knuckle boxing with a like-minded individual is a fundamental violation of basic human rights.

And no, I am not trying to be funny.

What makes government bans on bare-knuckle boxing even worse is that other forms of fighting might be even more dangerous. Especially MMA fighting.

Bryan Pedersen, chairman of the Wyoming State Board of Mixed Martial Arts “responded to critics by noting that bare-knuckle fighters can use only their fists, while MMA fighters and kickboxers can strike an opponent in the head with their elbows, knees and shins.” He considers bare-knuckle boxing “to be a safer sport than the two that we already regulate.”

According to promoter David Feldman: “In MMA, I can grab your head and ram it against my knee. How is that legal and bare knuckle isn’t? With bare knuckle, there is a perception of it being a more dangerous sport—but it’s actually safer.”

It’s just like the government demonizing marijuana even though alcohol and tobacco kill hundreds of thousands each year.

The fact that nanny statists and puritanical busybodies want to the government to continue to ban bare-knuckle boxing is of no consequence. Those with objections to bare-knuckle boxing have the right to try to persuade others not to promote it, participate in it, attend it, or watch in on pay-per-view. That’s it. They do not have the right to use the government to ban it. It is not the job of the government to decide what risks Americans are allowed to take and what kinds of behaviors they are allowed to engage in. It is an illegitimate function of government to try to keep people safe from their own actions. Government should never punish individuals for engaging in, or businesses for facilitating, peaceful, voluntary, and consensual actions that do not aggress against the person or property of others.

And it goes without saying that there should be no state athletic boards or commissions. This should all be handled by the private sector.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

No matter how poor, sick, or destitute a man is, if he owns anything, he owns his own body. The state doesn’t own it. Society doesn’t own it. The public doesn’t own it. And neither does some government agency or bureaucrat.

No, God owns his body. The man is merely a tenant.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-06-12   10:25:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

No, God owns his body.

Good point. And we know God has standards.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-12   13:19:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

He should be free to groom it, mutilate it, prostitute it, feed it, starve it, pierce it, strengthen it, cut it, disfigure it, tattoo it, deprive it, alter it, injure it, harm it, pamper it, neglect it, or otherwise use it as he sees fit.

Then surely he can walk around naked, right? And masturbate in public? And smoke marijuana in public? And curse and swear in public? And piss and shit in public?

Hey, it's HIS body and he's not harming anyone else. Plus, I think all of that's allowed in San Francisco already.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-12   13:25:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3) (Edited)

He should be free to groom it, mutilate it, prostitute it, feed it, starve it, pierce it, strengthen it, cut it, disfigure it, tattoo it, deprive it, alter it, injure it, harm it, pamper it, neglect it, or otherwise use it as he sees fit.

None of these activities infringe upon the rights of others.

And masturbate in public? And piss and shit in public?

Keep your bizarre lifestyle to yourself psycho.

You want to jerk off - do it in private.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Deckard  posted on  2018-06-12   16:59:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Deckard (#4)

None of these activities infringe upon the rights of others.

Doesn't smoking illegal marijuana and the effects of smoking illegal marijuana infringe upon the rights of others?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-12   18:02:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite, BorisY, Nuthouse (#5)

Doesn't smoking illegal marijuana and the effects of smoking illegal marijuana infringe upon the rights of others?

Is Boris blowing smoke on you again?

You poor baby!

hondo68  posted on  2018-06-12   18:45:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Deckard (#4)

None of these activities infringe upon the rights of others.

What about the family?

Also all those things smell of mental illness to me?

I guess in a real world the standard of if I do not harm others "physically" does not work.

Yes I do feel government has gone to far.

Justified  posted on  2018-06-12   19:03:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

No, God owns his body. The man is merely a tenant.

True dat.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-15   11:34:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#3)

Then surely he can walk around naked, right? And masturbate in public? And smoke marijuana in public? And curse and swear in public? And piss and shit in public?

Hey, it's HIS body and he's not harming anyone else. Plus, I think all of that's allowed in San Francisco already.

MW: +1

That was easy.

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-15   11:37:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Deckard (#4)

None of these activities infringe upon the rights of others.

But can/do certain activities and "infringe" upon the Law of God? What do HE say about it?

(Or for a Libertarian Believer, should *that* be a consideration?)

Liberator  posted on  2018-06-15   11:41:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com