[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*

Ladies Professional Golf Association using facial recognition technology to surveil fans and spectators

The world’s most nutritious foods

Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly,' lawyer says — Schnatter just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board

New Kentucky Law Puts Limits on Drone Spying, Will Help Thwart Federal Surveillance Program

What To Learn From The Social Justice Warrior Who Was Eaten By His Own Mob

Is the Media the “Enemy of the People”?

Well, I think I am going to have to schedule a surgery

War...

Las Vegas Police Body Cam: Cop Fires Through Windshield

3 Problems With Libertarianism - After Economics

Brazile, Rice, Obama Gave Russian Hackers Free Rein

The irrational hysteria over Trump and Putin

John Brennan Misses Communist Russia

The Latest: Trump says he misspoke on Russia meddling

Cop Charged After Video Shows Him Execute Unarmed Mother by Shooting Her in the Head

Cop Encounters Tortoise Going Too Slow on Highway, Overcomes His Fear and Doesn't Shoot.

Keeping Cops’ Hands Out of Your Pockets

Trump-Putin Summit Success: Neocons Furious!

Mandalay Bay's owner MGM has sued the Las Vegas mass shooting victims, claiming it's not liable for the massacre

Eric July On Why The Only Rights Are ‘Negative Rights’

Russian woman charged with being Putin’s SPY by joining NRA during Trump election campaign

Tucker Carlson: Mexico has interfered in US elections 'more successfully' than Russia

Months Before His Death, Anthony Bourdain Blasted ‘Rapey’ Bill Clinton, Exposed Hillary’s Complicity

The Shroud Of Turin Is Not Jesus' Burial Cloths

Trump calls off Cold War II

Police Come to Iraqi Veteran’s Home, Attempt to Confiscate His Guns, He Tells Them No

Hillary Clinton Is Exhausted, Everybody

‘Palestinian’ Man Skates Murder Charge for Stabbing Israeli Woman in Back, Sentenced on Assault

Trump's Putin Summit Is Another Reminder He Prefers Dictators to Democratic Leaders

Libertarians’ reality problem: How an estrangement from history yields abject failure

Trump Is Right to Meet Putin

Full transcript of Chris Wallace's interview in Helsinki with Russian president Vladimir Putin, as supplied by Fox News.

Chris Wallace interviews Russian President Vladimir Putin

Once Again, President Trump Is Magnificently Right—This Time About Russia

McCain rips Trump: 'One of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory'

Trump condemned as treasonous after press conference with Putin

How Everything is Racist, And You’re a Terrible Person

The big influence of 'Big Pink'

Documents Reveal Two US Soldiers Overheard Plot To Kill JFK—and Were Committed After Reporting It

Fox's Perino: Strzok marriage questions by GOP lawmaker 'felt like a public lynching (Relly? I don't think so, Dana!'

Trump: Strzok's testimony 'a disgrace to our country'

Trump Is Right: Mueller’s Latest Indictment Suggests He’s Conducting A Witch Hunt

Constitutional Conservatives Fail the Drug Test

Chipped Tires

A collision of views as Bath Township calls artist's work 'junk,' heads to court

How Elected Libertarians Are Making the World More Free

The fundamental contradiction of libertarianism

Dinosaur and man walking together

You're killin' me, Smalls. 'The Sandlot' celebrates 25th anniversary


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: Can Police Arrest Person Carrying Gun Without First Checking If He's Licensed? |
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 19, 2018
Author: Eugene Volokh|
Post Date: 2018-06-19 12:45:23 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 153
Comments: 10

Can Police Arrest Person Carrying Gun Without First Checking If He's Licensed? No, says the Illinois Appellate Court.

Eugene Volokh|Jun. 17, 2018 8:58 pm

Guns Fourth Amendment From Thursday's Illinois Appellate Court decision in State v. Penister (nonprecedential):

Penister [argues that his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment because] his possession of a gun did not give Whitlock reason to believe he had committed any offense, because Whitlock had no grounds for concluding that Penister did not have a valid FOID [Firearms Owners' Identification] card. The State contends that Whitlock had probable cause to arrest Penister because the circumstances showed a substantial possibility of criminal activity....

The State argues that the discovery of the gun gave Whitlock probable cause to arrest Penister, reasoning that "the police were not required to ... determine whether he had a valid FOID card or a Conceal Carry Permit prior to effectuating his arrest." According to the State's reasoning, an officer has probable cause to arrest anyone engaged in an activity that requires a license, and the officer can wait until after the arrest to determine whether the arrested person has the required license. So any officer can wait outside any courtroom, arrest all persons who acted as attorneys, and find out after the arrests whether the persons had the requisite licenses to practice law. See 705 ILCS 205/1 (West 2016) (unlicensed practice of law punishable as contempt); People v. Flinn, 47 Ill. App. 3d 357, 361 (1977) ("arrest and imprisonment may be imposed for civil contempt of court"). If any officer sees a person driving a car, the officer has probable cause to arrest the driver, and the officer can find out later whether the arrested person has a license to drive.

The police here operated on an outdated assumption—possession of a firearm in and of itself is a crime. Until recently, that was true in the City of Chicago. But the law has shifted dramatically during this decade. Since the legislature has legalized gun possession and concealed carry, many citizens may now possess firearms provided they have followed the regulations.

Our legislature has made a policy decision that has legal consequences for how law enforcement officers must deal with possession of firearms. No longer can police assume that a person seen with a firearm is involved in criminal activity. Law enforcement officers must adjust their procedures so that law- abiding citizens do not face the undue burden of arrest for licensed activity.

Once Officer Whitlock discovered the gun in the glove compartment, he could have attempted to find out whether Penister or Rockett had a license for the gun. If he found evidence that they had no such license, he would have had probable cause to arrest. But if police can lawfully arrest Penister here, without making any effort to determine whether he had a license for the gun, everyone found with a firearm would be subject to arrest, no questions asked.

Firearm owners who might wish to carry a concealed weapon should find that the facts of this case give them some cause for alarm. Even a person who could quickly prove the legality of gun possession would still face onerous arrest.

Arrests can have significant legal and reputational consequences. (Imagine, for example, a citizen legally carrying a concealed weapon who is arrested during her morning commute, who then must explain to her supervisor why she arrived hours late for work.) The approach the State advocates here—arrest first, sort it out later—would cause fundamental and manifest injustice.

We must not naively overlook the racially disparate impacts of this kind of police procedure. Consider the police homicide of Philando Castile. Castile, stopped for a traffic violation, told the officer that he was carrying a handgun. The officer pulled out his own gun and screamed, "Don't pull it out." Castile responded, "I'm not pulling it out." The officer fired seven shots, killing Castile. The entire encounter—from the officer approaching Castile's car to the shooting—took less than a minute.

What led police here to guess that Penister did not have an FOID card or a concealed carry license? The Second Amendment protects all citizens—not just those who appear to police likely to possess an FOID card. Police, prosecutors and judges need to stay alert to potential discriminatory treatment in the arrest of Blacks and other minorities for FOID card and concealed carry violations.

We hold that Penister's possession of a gun did not constitute probable cause to arrest him, as the gun possession did not support an inference that any offense had occurred. See People v. Aguilar, 2013 IL 112116, 20 (the second amendment right to bear arms extends beyond the home).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tpaine (#0)

Consider the police homicide of Philando Castile. Castile, stopped for a traffic violation, told the officer that he was carrying a handgun. The officer pulled out his own gun and screamed, "Don't pull it out." Castile responded, "I'm not pulling it out." The officer fired seven shots, killing Castile. The entire encounter—from the officer approaching Castile's car to the shooting—took less than a minute.

In police state Amerika - cops can pretty much do what they please without any repercussions.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.

Deckard  posted on  2018-06-19   13:16:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#1)

Consider the police homicide of Philando Castile.

The officer was acquitted of all charges.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-19   13:31:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#1)

State of Illinois 430 ILCS 66/10(g) -- A licensee shall possess a license at all times the licensee carries a concealed firearm ...

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-19   13:37:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#2)

The officer was acquitted of all charges.

Thanks for making my point boot-licker.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

Trump: My People Should ‘Sit Up in Attention’ Like Kim Jong-un’s Staff.

Deckard  posted on  2018-06-19   13:38:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Deckard (#4)

Thanks for making my point boot-licker.

So your conclusion is that if a person is acquitted of a crime by a jury of their peers that means "they got away with it"?

How about, "If the driver was white the officer never would have been charged to begin with"? How about, "The city caved to pressure of the black community despite the video and audio evidence which clearly showed the officer acting defensively? How about, "The officer had his career ended because spineless politicians surrendered to the SJW and BLM crowd"? How about, "The driver would be alive today if he wasn't high on marijuana and had simply obeyed the officer?"

misterwhite  posted on  2018-06-19   14:27:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tpaine, Deckard, misterwhite (#0)

We hold that Penister's possession of a gun did not constitute probable cause to arrest him, as the gun possession did not support an inference that any offense had occurred. See People v. Aguilar, 2013 IL 112116, 20 (the second amendment right to bear arms extends beyond the home).

Penister was found GUILTY as charged. The Court found an assertion that Penister had a prior felony conviction was wrong, that it was a misdemeanor conviction. This could have wrongfully affected the length of sentence. The conviction was affirmed, the sentence was vacated, and the case was remanded to the trial court for resentencing.

Illinois v Penister, 2018 IL Ap (1st) 151552-U (14 Jun 2018)

JUSTICE NEVILLE delivered the judgment of the court. Justices Pucinski and Hyman concurred in the judgment.

ORDER

¶ 1 Held: Defendant's stipulation at trial that he did not have a FOID card justified the court's inference that he did not have a concealed carry license. Because police conducting a valid Terry stop saw evidence that the defendant possessed a gun, motions to quash arrest and suppress evidence would not have produced a better result for the defendant. But the defendant sufficiently showed ineffective assistance of counsel by showing that counsel failed to present available evidence that the defendant had a prior conviction for a misdemeanor, not a felony.

¶ 2 The trial court found Brenon Penister guilty of possessing a loaded gun in a car without a concealed carry license and sentenced him to 3 years in prison. Penister argues that the evidence does not prove that he lacked a concealed carry license for the gun, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to file motions to quash arrest and suppress evidence, and because counsel failed to present available evidence at sentencing.

¶ 3 We find that the evidence that Penister lacked an FOID card justifies the court's inference that he also lacked a concealed carry license. Motions to quash arrest and suppress evidence would not have prevented the prosecution from presenting evidence that Penister had a gun, and therefore defense counsel's failure to file those motions does not show ineffective assistance of counsel. But Penister showed that he received ineffective assistance at sentencing when counsel failed to present available evidence that Penister had a prior conviction only for a misdemeanor, not a felony. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

- - - - - - - - - -

¶ 47 CONCLUSION

¶ 48 Because Penister needed to have a valid FOID card to obtain a concealed carry license, the trier of fact could infer from his lack of an FOID card that he had no concealed carry license. Counsel's failure to file motions to quash arrest and suppress evidence does not show ineffective assistance of counsel, because such motions should not have led the court to bar evidence that police found the gun in a valid search incident to a Terry stop. However, Penister showed that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to present to the trial court the sentencing order from his prior conviction, as that order casts doubt on the State's contention that the applicable sentencing statute for the current conviction required a sentence of at least 3 years in prison.

¶ 49 Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated and cause remanded.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

https://www.scribd.com/document/382119684/Illinois-v-Penister-2018-IL-AP-1st-151552-U-14-Jun-2018

nolu chan  posted on  2018-06-19   15:17:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu chan (#6)

Spam......

tpaine  posted on  2018-06-19   18:28:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: tpaine (#7)

Spam......

The thread article forgot to mention that the defendant's conviction was AFFIRMED. The only thing he won was a resentencing.

The cop did not have probable cause to arrest just because the defendant had a gun. Instead, the cop executed a lawful Terry stop and he had lawful authority to search the car. When he lawfully found the loaded and unlicensed gun for which no concealed carry permit existed, arrest, trial and conviction were appropriate.

Defendant stipulated at trial that he did not have a Firearms Owner Identification Card (FOID). The court found this justified its inference that the defendant did not have a concealed carry license.

The arrest was lawful for reasons other than just being in possession of a gun.

It was a righteous bust and the defendant's conviction was affirmed.

That ain't spam.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-06-20   10:59:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: nolu chan (#8)

Volokh --- We hold that Penister's possession of a gun did not constitute probable cause to arrest him, as the gun possession did not support an inference that any offense had occurred. See People v. Aguilar, 2013 IL 112116, 20 (the second amendment right to bear arms extends beyond the home)

Nolu spam --- The cop did not have probable cause to arrest just because the defendant had a gun. Instead, the cop executed a lawful Terry stop and he had lawful authority to search the car. When he lawfully found the loaded and unlicensed gun for which no concealed carry permit existed, arrest, trial and conviction were appropriate.

I'll take a real lawyers opinion over yours..

Sorry bout that..

tpaine  posted on  2018-06-20   20:20:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: tpaine (#9)

I'll take a real lawyers opinion over yours..

Sorry bout that..

I'll take the actual court opinion over your opinion.

Not sorry about that.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-06-21   9:26:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com