[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Reports Claim Jussie Smollet Allegedly Staged Hate Crime Attack; Police Say News Is 'Unconfirmed, Inaccurate’

C.I. Whose Heroin Buy Led to a Deadly Houston Drug Raid Does Not Seem to Exist

Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg back at court after cancer bout (fake news, no pics)

Terry Kath - The little-known rock guitarist who was 'better' than Jimi Hendrix

Nancy Pelosi Earned Fortune on IPO Stock Through ‘Illegal’ Insider Trading

George Soros says Europe faces ‘oblivion’ as pro-freedom parties set to win big in European election

US Air Freight Company that Smuggled Weapons Into Venezuela Linked to CIA "Black Site" Renditions

The Democrat-Communist Party Isn't Going To Like This

‘Shameful & disgusting!’ TSA slammed for ‘invasive groping’ of triple-amputee US veteran

Trump’s Absurd Claim that Americans Are Free from Government Coercion

It is the right and duty of all Americans to REFUSE to comply with unconstitutional gun laws

The pope and Islam’s most important imam just signed a covenant that pushes us much closer to a One World Religion

There’s Nothing Ridiculous About Trains Replacing Planes

Study Shows Concealed Carry Permit Holders Break Laws Far Less Than Cops

US Company That Smuggled Weapons Into Venezuela Linked to CIA “Black Site” Renditions

Tasered 11 Times Over Turn Signal

As US piles on sanctions, foreign investors pour more money into Russia

The US Air Force Has Won Control of the Space Force

Green monster: California abandons high-speed rail line between LA and San Francisco

JEWISH LEADERS Thank President Trump In New York Times Full Page Ad – Criticize Freshman Democrats on Anti-Semitic Positions

Florida School Arms Up; Hires Two Former Combat Veterans To Prevent Mass Shootings

'Germs are not a real thing': Fox News host says he hasn't washed hands in 10 years

Unprecedented Gun Confiscation Hits US as Thousands Of Guns Seized from Innocent Citizens

Antifa activist facing assault charges was tied to Democratic policymakers

Michelle Obama Stuns With a Surprise Appearance at the Grammys

Pro-life activists seek justice for murdered unborn child amid new abortion laws (Stabbing mother not baby murder)

Walter Jones, who worked to atone for his Iraq war vote, is dead at 76

The U.S. Faces A Catastrophic Food Supply Crisis In America As Farmers Struggle

IMF warns of global economic "storm"

Julia Louis-Dreyfus Tears Into ‘Pretend President’ Trumpt

The case for Russia collusion ....Against The Democrats

The Tax Poem

Warren refocuses populist messaWarren refocuses populist message in official kickoffge in official kickoff

Why I Hope Maduro Wins And North Korea Keeps Its Nukes

Video of Roger Stone’s arrest like 'SEAL Team 6 going into bin Laden's compound': Tucker Carlson

Jew-haters burn down New York yeshiva, paint swastikas

TERROR: 19 Year-Old Girl Ori TERROR: 19 Year-Old Girl Ori Ansbacher Found Brutally Murdered, Mutilated in Forest Near Jerusalem Zoo, “Shocking Brutality” Found Brutally Murdered, Mutilated in Forest Near Jerusalem Zoo, “Shocking Brutality”

Australian father teaches kids how to handle a “crocodile” loose in neighbourhood

Camel-a Harris' 2020 Platform

Francis Rooney Endorses Large Tax Increase (R-FL)

John Roberts joins liberal justices as Supreme Court blocks Louisiana abortion clinic law

Democrats

Weld switches from Libertarian back to GOP as he mulls 2020 challenge to Trump

HOUSE DEMOCRATS HELD THE FIRST CLIMATE CHANGE HEARINGS IN SIX YEARS. IT WAS A MESS

US test-launches Minuteman ICBM from southern California (Vandenberg AFB)

What Should Be Christians’ Response to ‘Same-Sex Marriage’?

THERE'S NO GOOD REASON TO TRUST BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY

Russia jails Danish Jehovah's Witness for 6 years in purge

SOTU

7-year-old buried alive in ‘coffin of snow’ after failing to recite bible verses


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: GOP Winner in Maine-02 Now Declared Loser Due to ‘Rank Voting’
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/ ... ared-loser-due-to-rank-voting/
Published: Dec 6, 2018
Author: Michael Patrick Leahy
Post Date: 2018-12-06 08:03:41 by hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 54
Comments: 2

An election worker prepares ballots for tabulation in the count for Maine's 2nd Congressional District

On Monday, Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap announced that a recount of the November 6 election in Maine’s Second Congressional District will begin on Thursday and will continue for an estimated four weeks.

Secretary of State Dunlap, a Democrat, declared Democrat Jared Golden the winner of the election on November 15, despite the fact that Rep. Bruce Poliquin (R-ME-02) received 2,632 more votes than Golden on election day, a consequence of the state’s implementation of a controversial “rank voting” system.

Thanks to a 2016 referendum that was placed on the state ballot and was passed due to the financial support of liberal Texas billionaire John Arnold, Maine’s 2018 federal election was the first time in American history that candidates were federal offices were selected using a complex “rank voting system.”

Since a Maine judge had earlier ruled that the “rank voting system” passed by voters in 2016 and affirmed by voters in June 2018 violated the Maine Constitution, state offices were selected by the traditional voting system used in the rest of the country–winners were determined by who received the most votes.

Federal offices–in this case the Senate race that incumbent Sen. Angus King (I-ME) easily won, and the state’s two seats in the U.S. House of Representatives–were decided by the complex “rank voting” system, as implemented by the Democrat Secretary of State, using a proprietary computer algorithm provided to the state by an outside vendor.

When Maine voters stepped into the voting booth on November they cast traditional ballots for state offices, but voted for their first, second, and third choices in the one federal race for the U.S. Senate the two federal races for the U.S. House of Representatives.

In order to be declared the winner, a candidate for federal office had to receive 50 percent plus one of the first place votes cast for the office. If no candidate received more than 50 percent plus one of the vote, then the second choice votes and third choice votes cast by voters whose first choice votes were cast for the third place and fourth place finishers were then allocated to the top two candidates based on the proprietary computer algorithm of the outside vendor selected by the Democrat Secretary of State.

In the November 6 election, Republican Poliquin finished in first place, receiving 131,631 votes, or 46.41 percent of the 283,643 votes cast that day, according to election results provided by the office of Secretary of State Dunlap.

Democrat Jared Golden finished in second place, receiving 128,999 votes, or 45.48 percent of the 2 votes cast that day, 2,632 fewer than Polquin.

Independent candidate Tiffany Bonds received 16,260 votes, or 5.73 percent of the 283,643 votes cast that day and finished in third place. Another independent candidate, William Hoar, received 6,753 votes, or 2.38 percent of the 283,643 votes cast that day and finished in fourth place. Bonds and Hoard received a combined 23,013 votes.

Since no candidate in the race received the 50 percent plus one votes required to be declared the winner under the new “ranked voting” law, Secretary of State Dunlap then used the outside vendor which deployed its proprietary algorithm to allocate the combined 23,013 votes cast for third place finisher Bonds and fourth place finisher Hoard.

In what Secretary of State Dunlap described as Round 2, all 16,260 votes were removed from Tiffany Bonds’ total, giving her a new total of zero votes. In addition, all 6,753 votes were removed from Hoar’s total, giving him a new total of zero votes.

Golden received 10,232 votes from voters who had declared in the November 6 election either Bonds or Hoar as their first choice, presumably declaring him on their ballots to be either their second or third choices. These additional votes gave Golden a new total of 139,231 votes, or 50.53 percent of the 275,557 votes counted in Round 2.

Poliquin received 4,695 votes from voters who had declared in the November 6 election either Bonds or Hoar as their first choice, presumably declaring him on their ballots to be either their second or third choices. These additional votes gave Hoar a new total of 136,326 votes, or 49.47 percent of the 275,557 votes counted in Round 2.

Only 14,927 of the 23,013 votes cast in support of either Bonds, the third place finisher, or Hoar, the fourth place finisher, were reallocated to Poliquin, the election day first place finisher and Golden, the election day second place finisher, in Round 2.

A total of 8,086 votes cast by supporters of Hoar or Bonds on election day were thrown away and not counted in Round 2 voting–“spoiled” is the legal term used–because, according to the Secretary of State, did not include choice rankings beyond the first choice.

Notably, though Democrat Golden received more than 50 percent plus one (50.57 percent) of the votes counted in Round 2 using this “ranked voting” system, he still received less than 50 percent plus one of the votes cast and counted on election day, November 6, Round 1. (The 139,231 votes counted for Golden in Round 2 divided by the 283,643 votes cast and counted on election day, November 6, Round 1 equals 49.1 percent.)

Poliquin’s general campaign consultant Brent Littlefield issued a statement earlier this week noting that “his win was clipped by a new ‘Rank Voting’ system employed for the first time in a U.S. Federal election giving losing candidate voters (in this case two liberal independents who finished 3rd and 4th on Election Day) a second or third choice and those additional votes allowed challenger Jared Golden (D) to go ahead. In any other state in America Bruce Poliquin would have been declared the winner of the election.”

Poliquin and several voters in the Second Congressional District have filed a lawsuit in federal court arguing that the “rank voting” system approved by Maine voters in 2016 and reaffirmed in June 2018 is not constitutional.

On Wednesday, federal judge Lance Walker said he would decide the case soon.

“Attorneys for U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin and U.S. Rep.-elect Jared Golden argued in federal court Wednesday about the constitutionality of Maine’s ranked-choice voting law, the election process that propelled Golden to a victory over the two-term incumbent Poliquin in November,” the Portland Press Herald reported, adding:

Poliquin’s lawyers are asking U.S. District Judge Lance Walker to rule that the law, passed by voters in November 2016 and affirmed with a citizens’ veto vote in June, violates the U.S. Constitution. They are arguing that Poliquin should either be declared the winner based on the fact he won the plurality of votes in the first round of counting or that there should be a special election, or runoff, between Golden, a Democrat, and Poliquin, a Republican.

“A tremendous number of voters expressed confusion over the new process where they voted one type of ballot for state races and another type of ballot for federal races which resembled an excel spreadsheet where they could make a 2nd, 3rd, 4th or even a 5th choice, adding a write-in,” Littlefield added:

Rank Voting claims to produce a winner with majority support, over 50%, but the fact is the system is not designed to do so. If no candidate receives 50%+1 on Election Day the rank voting system is engaged. However, moving forward the last place candidates ballots are “spoiled” or eliminated if there is no additional ranking for other candidates… therefore the total number of voters is reduced by the computer and the eventual winner does not actually get 50%+1 of those who turned out on Election Day. This makes this system very different from normal runoff states like Louisiana. Here the computer algorithm determines the final ballot.

Only those voters who voted for last place finishing candidates have their additional choices considered. Surviving candidates ballots simply stay in the mix. Those voters do not get the option to “ponder” their choices like the others in subsequent voting rounds by the computer system.

Littlefield also added that, “The computer software was declared proprietary and the Secretary of State has refused to allow an inspection of the software or algorithm.”

Democrats and their allies spent more than $20 million to defeat Poliquin. Should he win the recount or the pending lawsuit, he will be the only Republican member of the House of Representatives in the 116th Session of Congress from the six states that comprise New England–Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.


Poster Comment:

More voters would rather have Golden than Pokeum if neither gets the majority of the votes, so he's the popular choice, aka the winner. It's a better system of voting.

The GOP is the party of whining crybabies, look at donnell always sniveling about something or the other.

(2 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: hondo68 (#0)

More voters would rather have Golden than Pokeum if neither gets the majority of the votes, so he's the popular choice, aka the winner. It's a better system of voting.

The pluralist version of voting that is and has been the standard throughout all of American history is, IMO, overall the worst voting system there is. It tends to NOT represent the will of the majority, but rather, the will of the biggest minority. If you get 4 candidates for a single office and one is a liberal and the other 3 conservative, and 40% of the population is liberal vs 60% conservative, the single liberal candidate will win with 40% of the popular vote while the 3 conservatives split the remainder getting 20% each.

Of course, reversing the line up with 1 conservative and 3 liberal candidates and the conservatives win. Obviously, elections should be won by candidates who have views that are most popular among voters and not care about the breakdown of views of the candidates.

The system used in Maine is the IRV type or Instant Run-Off method. It's a far better method for 3rd party candidates because it gets rid of the "wasted vote syndrome" where people are discouraged from voting for anyone other than R's and D's, and gives people a full opportunity to register a vote preference that is different from the leading two. When people understand this, future elections will open the door to something other than R's & D's.

However, critics of it are correct that it is a much more confusing ballot. While the average person could understand it with a little instruction, most are not used to it and of course, half of the voting population is below average intelligence, or perhaps just don't think in a way that makes the procedure easy to assimilate in less than 15 seconds. It also makes vote counting much more difficult, and the idea that the software used to count it should be considered proprietary A) reeks of potential vote fraud, and B) is hardly sophisticated enough to warrant a proprietary consideration.

A better method to IRV is "Approval Voting" which addresses both of these issues by simply allowing people to cast votes for as many candidates as they want. I.e. those candidates they "approve" of. Every vote for each candidate has the same weight and priority whether a voter voted for only 1 candidate or all of them. All are counted on the first round. Then the candidate with the most vote (i.e. the most popularity) wins.

This makes ballots simple to understand for the voter as they are almost unchanged from current ballots, and also only requires one round of vote counting. It's far easier to verify.

In spite of the election outcome in Maine, I'm glad to see IRV starting to make inroads as it's far more important for people to understand there are other methods of voting that give third parties a chance to compete with something other than an R and D label. That the election was apparently reversed after 3rd party voters had their votes reallocated to the 2nd place candidate further empowers those who voted 3rd party on the first round. A good thing, as in next elections, mainstream candidates will know they must appeal to the majority of all voters and not just a majority of R and D voters.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-12-06   11:00:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: hondo68 (#0)

It's a better system of voting.

The retard has spoken.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-12-06   11:06:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com