[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

30 years ago, “Weird Al" Yankovic's "UHF" becomes a cult classic

Afghanistan Isn't Worth Dying For

Trump: Sen. Rand Paul to help with Iran negotiations

In Bizarre Move, US House Chaplain Gives ‘Exorcism’ Prayer to Drive Demons Out of Congress

MDMA Shown to Help Alcoholics Shake Addiction in New Study

Another Associate of Trump and Clinton Just Got Charged with Sex Trafficking

Charges Dropped vs. Mom Facing 60 Days in Jail for Toddler Peeing in Parking Lot

Detroit Man who Spent 3 Nights in Jail for Jaywalking Settles for $45,000

Texas Cops Beat and Taser Man after finding Antibiotics in his Car

White supremacy could be issue that 'ends this country,' presidential candidate says

Trump has not built a single mile of new border fence after 30 months in office

Mark Levin puts war first and America last

Somali-Born Journalist Returned To Her Homeland To Document How 'Safe' The Country Is But Terrorists Killed Her

A Florida woman was fined $100,000 for a dirty pool and overgrown grass. When do fines become excessive? [she didn't even own it]

Family Gets $750k After SWAT Raided and Destroyed Their Home, Killed Their Dog—Over Unpaid Utility Bill

Michelle Obama is ‘most admired’ woman in the world, new poll says (Bullshit Alert)

U-M student Kathy Zhu stripped of Miss Michigan World America title

Moon Landings Debate on False Flag Weekly News with Massimo Mazzucco 07/19/2019

Grand Jury Filing Over Use of Explosives on 9/11 ‘Names Names’ of Who May Have Blown Up Towers

Hating America After 9/11

The CIA Wants To Make It Easier To Jail Journalists And No One In Congress Is Stopping It From Happening

Jeffrey Epstein: CFR and Trilateral Commission Member

Robert Mueller Should Be Arrested for Conspiracy to Overthrow the President of the United States

Surprise Twist in WikiLeaks Case! UK Refuses to Extradite Assange to Country With Death Penalty!

Tempus Fugit

"It's Going To Be Staggering": Epstein Associates Prepare For Worst As Massive Document Dump Imminent

Rush Limbaugh Abandons Fiscal Conservatism

Round-Up of Crypto Exchange Hacks So Far in 2019 — How Can They Be Stopped?

Bitpoint Hack Shows That Regulators’ Scrutiny Does Not Equal Safety

The Federalist: Democrats Called for Seb Gorka to Be Deported Over Sham Twitter-Based Claims, and Jerry Nadler Even Opened an Investigation Seeking to Deport Him, and the Media Cheered

A Kentucky farmer, ex-Marine wants to challenge Mitch McConnell in 2020 US Senate race

Police called on boy holding 'ice cold beer' sign

What Was It All for For: Vets Have Finally Turned on America’s Endless Wars

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624 ← JINSA Bob Nelson Famous Duck Routine → Video shows Donald Trump partying with Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

Republicans Defending Trump Are 'Hurting Themselves and They're Hurting the Country'

DIVORCE AGREEMENT Between Republicans & Democrats

Rand Paul Wants To Be Trump's Man in Iran. That Would Be Good News for Peace.

Elderly robocall scam victim committed suicide after 'fraudsters' stole life savings

Watch Elon Musk’s Neuralink presentation

“Did He Not Make Them One?”

Jon Stewart Eviscerates Rand Paul for Blocking 9/11 Victim Funding: ‘It’s an Abomination’

President Trump On Ilhan Omar: I Hear She Was Married To Her Brother!

SHOCK: Portland ANTIFA Holds Memorial For ICE Firebomb Terrorist

‘Trump’s Going to Get Re-elected, Isn’t He?’

Surprise! Illegal immigration deeply unpopular with voters … in Mexico

FBI To Ramp Up Social Media Surveillance

THE NEW ROTH SHOW #16C Timing is everything,

America, Love It or Leave It!

Trump May Appoint Fringe Neocon to Head Intelligence

What Would a Free Society Actually Look Like?


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: The In-Car Checkpoint
Source: Eric Peters Autos
URL Source: https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2019/06/14/the-in-car-checkpoint/
Published: Jun 14, 2019
Author: Eric
Post Date: 2019-06-16 14:34:03 by Deckard
Ping List: *Cars and Automotive*     Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Keywords: None
Views: 74
Comments: 1

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A new principle forms the basis of American criminal justice. It is that innocence is irrelevant. More accurately, it is an obstruction.

It gets in the way of what government wants – which is to bully and control everyone.

The former requirement in law – and general custom – that conviction had to precede punishment and that evidence to suggest wrongdoing had to precede investigation has been thrown in the woods – so to speak – in favor of making things easier for the criminal justice system by assuming everyone is a criminal.

And treating all of us presumptively as such.

The latest such being a proposal – a threatened law, HR 3374 – purveyed by a termagant to liberty named Kathleen Rice, who is a coercive authoritarian “representative” (of whom begs some interesting questions) from the state of New York. She is demanding that all new cars be fitted with Breathalyzers – and ignition interlocks – by 2029.

You used to have to be convicted of drunk driving before they installed a Breathalyzer machine in your car. Rice wants them installed in every car – whether you drink or not.

The “drunk” part of her proposed law – the End Drunk Driving Act – is especially fatuous given the already low national standard defining it. A Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of .08  has been legally synonymous with presumptive “drunk” driving for the past 20-plus years – meaning no evidence of impaired driving had to be presented; the BAC alone suffices to convict.

This, of course, amounts to punishing people for violating a rule rather than for driving “drunk.” It specifically punishes people whose driving can’t be faulted – which also begs some interesting questions about the real motive behind all of this.

The former race car driver Bob Bondurant – who for years ran a high-performance driving school I was lucky enough to attend – likes his beer. And even with several in him was more in control of the Ford Econoline van he took us around the test track in  than my ex mother-in-law is in control of her Hyundai out on the public roads, absent any beers (or BAC) at all.

But never mind; virtue-signaling hysteria about booze trumps any discussion of impairment.

Which is why the maximum allowed BAC is in the process of being virtue-signaled to effectively zero in a number of states and actually is zero – if you’re not 21 years old old – in states that have a “zero tolerance” policy for any alcohol in your system if you’re not of legal age to drink.

It doesn’t matter that you’re obviously not “drunk” if your BAC is .01 or even .04  – and arguably not even .05, the new threshold defining “drunk” for all in states such as Utah

Or that you might be impaired by something else – such as poor driving skills, a form of behind-the-wheel debility far more common than the booze-infused kind and objectively far more dangerous because there are many more such out there and there are no checkpoints for the inept.

What matters – as far as the law and this Rice woman are concerned – is the use of the pretext to establish the precedent. If the government can force Breathalyzers on everyone then why not also random home checks by armed government workers to look for . . . well, anything? 

On the basis of . . . nothing.

How about monitoring software on your computer and cell phone to make sure you’re not going where you shouldn’t be on the Internet? After all, you – anyone – might.

Children are being exploited – or could be – and what have you got to hide?

Wait.

The law loves precedent. Non-lawyers and those who don’t think as lawyers (and politicians) do don’t get this. They ought to – and the sooner they do, the less damage we’ll have to undo.

Rice herself may simply be an opportunistic legislative jihadi in search of a faux cause – or a genuinely fervid neo-Prohibitionist harpie with a neurotic fixation on alcohol in any amount as sinful.

And sins must be punished – no matter how faultless your driving.  

If her fatwa is passed, you will still be allowed to drink – provided you stay home. Or stay where you are. Any drinking prior to driving will mean no driving – whether you’re “drunk” being entirely beside the point.

 

The car won’t go.

And you won’t have to “blow,” either. The Breathalyzer she is proposing is really a passive alcohol sensor that samples you via your skin – or can detect booze (or Listerine – another problem) on your breath by sampling the air inside the car.

Your Rice-approved new car will also very likely narc you out to the insurance mafia for even trying to drive – that constituting evidence of an “unsafe” attitude. Attempting to defeat the device, meanwhile, will probably be some sort of crime in and of itself – regardless of drinking (or not).

And even if you don’t drink, ever, you’ll still pay – for another cloying technology you don’t want and more importantly, don’t deserve.

See that earlier point about not having been convicted of  . . . anything.

Because  if Rice succeeds, you’ll be forced to pay for the Breathalyzer and related tech, both up front as well as down the road – when any of the various components involved breaks. Which you’ll be required to pay to have fixed.

For saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety! 

Just add it to the bar tab – so to speak. You’re already paying for things like air bags (at least $1,000 per car in up-front costs and may the finance gods help you if they ever deploy and need to be replaced).

You’ll also pay another way – in terms of the freedom you once enjoyed to not be treated as a criminal before being convicted of a criminal act.

But this Rice creature isn’t interested in any of that. She is here to Keep Us Safe – no matter what it costs us.

And no matter that Keeping Us Safe is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, ostensibly (but far from actually) the law of the land.

(9 images)

Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

What matters – as far as the law and this Rice woman are concerned – is the use of the pretext to establish the precedent. If the government can force Breathalyzers on everyone then why not also random home checks by armed government workers to look for . . . well, anything?

On the basis of . . . nothing.

SPOT ON ARTICLE!

Progressive-Socialist womens-folk in gummint are THE biggest authoritarians and fascists. YUGE mistake letting them vote. They and their dopey votes and making Gummint the Abusive Tranny-Daddy of all of us have flushed the USA down the crapper.

Liberator  posted on  2019-06-16   15:21:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com